Kentucky And Virginia Resolutions Article Index for
Kentucky 		Website Links For
Kentucky 		 

Information About

Kentucky And Virginia Resolutions
  CATEGORIES ABOUT KENTUCKY AND VIRGINIA RESOLUTIONS
   
legal history of the united states
   
1798 in law
   
history of the united states 1789–1849
   
SHOPPER'S DELIGHT
 
Shop For:  
Department
Price Minimum:
Price Maximum:
      



.]]

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were important political statements in favor of States Rights written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1798. They were passed by the two states in opposition to the federal Alien And Sedition Acts . Though often mentioned as a pair in modern historical discussions, they were actually two separate documents. The '''Kentucky Resolutions''' (plural) were written secretly by Thomas Jefferson and passed by the state legislature on November 16 , 1798 , with one more being passed the following year on December 3rd , 1799 . The '''Virginia Resolution''' was secretly written by James Madison and passed by the state legislature on December 24 , 1798 . Jefferson and Madison collaborated on the writing of the two documents. The resolutions attacked the Sedition Act, which extended the powers of the federal government over individuals inside the states. The resolutions declared that the Constitution was a "compact." That is, it was an agreement between the central government and the states—-not an agreement among the states. The federal government had no right to exercise powers not specifically delegated to it; should the federal government assume such powers, its acts under them would be void. Thus it was the right of the states to decide as to the constitutionality of such laws passed by Congress.

The resolutions were submitted to other states for approval but with no success. In New Hampshire , newspapers treated them as military threats and replied with sinister foreshadowings of civil war. "We think it highly probable that Virginia and Kentucky will be sadly disappointed in their infernal plan of exciting insurrections and tumults," proclaimed one. The legislature's unanimous reply was blunt:

Resolved that the Legislature of New Hampshire unequivocally express a firm resolution to maintain and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of this State against every aggression either foreign or domestic, and that they will support the Government of the United States in all measures warranted by the former. That the State Legislatures are not the proper tribunals to determine the Constitutionality of the laws of the General Government—that the duty of such decision is properly and exclusively confided to the Judicial department. Counter-Resolutions of Other States


At a more serious level, Alexander Hamilton , then building up the army, suggested sending it into Virginia, on some “obvious pretext.” Measures would be taken, he hinted an ally in Congress, “to act upon the laws & put Virginia to the Test of resistance.” Feb. 2, 1799, ''Hamilton Papers'' vol 22 pp 452-53.

The Resolutions joined the foundational beliefs of Jefferson's party and were used as party documents in the 1800 election. They became part of the heritage of the "Old Republicans." Their long-term importance lies not in their attack on the Sedition law, but rather in their strong statements of states' rights theory, which led to rather different concepts of Nullification and Interposition . Jefferson at one point drafted a threat for Virginia to secede, but dropped it from the text.

Decades after the Resolutions were published, during the " also rejected the compact theory saying the Constitution was a binding contract among the states and no contract can be changed unilaterally by one party.

Historians have been ambivalent about the resolutions because of their long-term impact. As Jefferson's biographer explains:


Called forth by oppressive legislation of the national government, notably the Alien and Sedition Laws, they represented a vigorous defense of the principles of freedom and self-government under the United States Constitution. But since the defense involved an appeal to principles of state rights, the resolutions struck a line of argument potentially as dangerous to the Union as were the odious laws to the freedom with which it was identified. One hysteria tended to produce another. A crisis of freedom threatened to become a crisis of Union. The latter was deferred in 1798-1800, but it would return, and when it did the principles Jefferson had invoked against the Alien and Sedition Laws would sustain delusions of state sovereignty fully as violent as the Federalist delusions he had combated. Merrill D. Peterson; ''Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation: A Biography'' 1975.



NOTES



REFERENCES

  • Elkins, Stanley and Eric McKitrick. ''The Age of Federalism'' (1995)

  • Koch, Adrienne. and Harry Ammon. "The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions: An Episode in Jefferson's and Madison's Defense of Civil Liberties," ''William and Mary, Quarterly'' April 1948, pp. 145-76. online at JSTOR

  • Koch, ''Jefferson and Madison: The Great Collaboration'' (1950), ch. 7.

  • Watkins, William. ''Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy'' (2004)



EXTERNAL LINKS