Greenfacts

GreenFacts' primary function is to provide summaries of scientific consensus reports on environment and health issues (such as Climate Change and Tobacco ). GreenFacts' aim is to rewrite these highly technical, scientific publications into something more easily understood by lay readers. The summaries are subjected to a peer review ( by experts in that field for faithfulness to the original document. The peer review process is overseen by an independent scientific board ([http://about.greenfacts.org/whos-who/scientific-board.htm ). These summaries are then published on the organization's Website, listed below.

The organization's industry funding has led some to question the information it presents. GreenFacts was founded in , instead seeking subsidies from public authorities such as the European Commission and the Belgian Government . Such subsidies are not generally made available to organizations that have existed for less than three years. In 2005 , GreenFacts estimates its total income at €680,000 ( {Link without Title} ).

GreenFacts states that one of its missions is to foster dialogue between environmentalists, industry and others by providing accessible and neutral information. However, its reports have been criticized as biased toward the concept of " Sound Science " — which is viewed by many in the scientific community as a nebulous, essentially political term often used to justify a predetermined (generally opposing) worldview.

GreenFacts has distanced itself from radical Activists , instead stressing its commitment to "dialogue and co-operation, rather than activism and confrontation." (''The Research Headlines'', published by the European Commission ( {Link without Title} )

Though GreenFacts was established as a non-advocacy organization, some critics — mainly SourceWatch — say it has inserted itself into policy debates seeking to influence certain policies, including helping develop governmental health action plans. {Link without Title}

EXTERNAL LINKS

Information About

Greenfacts