Site Map

  Duggleby Howe Website Links For
Howe
 

Information About

Duggleby Howe

APPAREL
BABY
BEAUTY
BOOKS
CAR TOYS
CELL PHONES
DVD'S
ELECTRONICS
GOURMET FOOD
GROCERIES
HEALTH & PERSONAL
HOME & GARDEN
JEWELRY
MUSIC
MUSIC INSTRUMENTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SOFTWARE
SPORTING GOODS
TOOLS & HARDWARE
TOYS
VIDEO GAMES
SHOPPING HOME

MORE SHOPPING...



largest Round Barrows in Britain , located on the
southern side of the Great Wold Valley in East Yorkshire , and is
one of four such monuments in this area, known collectively as the
Great Barrows Of East Yorkshire . Duggleby Howe is believed on the
basis of artefacts recovered to be of Late Neolithic date, but no
Radiocarbon dates are available.

The monument consists of a mound, the base of which was 120 feet (37 metres)
in diameter. The top of the barrow was apparently truncated at some point
in the past, leaving an almost-level platform some 47 feet (14 metres) in
diameter. On this was constructed a Post-mill of Medieval type.
The mound was 22 feet (7 metres) high at the eastern end and 18 or 19 feet
(5 or 6 metres) high at the western end.

The barrow lies within a roughly circular enclosure, approximately 370
metres in diameter, formed from interrupted ditches, and open to the south.
To the east of the barrow, one within the enclosure and one outside, are two
Ring Ditches , believed to be of Bronze Age date. Although the
barrow itself was long known, it was not until 1979 that the existence
of the enclosure was confirmed using aerial photographs taken by D.N. Riley.

The barrow was first excavated in either 1798 or 1799 by the Reverend
Christopher Sykes, but of his excavation no records remain. Beginning on
July 21st 1890 J.R. Mortimer , under the
sponsorship of Sir Tatton Sykes , excavated "an area of 40
feet square over the centre of the barrow, and a portion of the east side"
over a period of more than six weeks. This excavation was re-assessed by
Ian Kinnes, Timothy Schadla-Hall, Paul Chadwick and Philip Dean in 1983
to produce the interpretation presented below.


Phase I


In the first phase of activity at Duggleby Howe a shaft grave was
excavated and at the base of it was interred an adult male in a crouched
position accompanied by a Towthorpe Bowl , flint cores and flint flakes.

Higher up in the fill of the shaft grave were interred an adult and an
infant, both in a crouched position. At the feet of the adult was placed
another adult's skull.


Phase II


Once the shaft grave had been back-filled two adults, accompanied by
flint and antler tools, were laid in the hollow created by the settling of
the fill of the shaft grave.


Phase III


To the east of the shaft grave was then cut a shallow grave in
which was deposited another adult in a couched position, accompanied by
flint arrowheads, flint flakes, a bone pin, and various implements formed
from boar tusk and beaver tooth.

The primary round barrow, comprised of "clayey or earthy matter" was
then erected and in it were included the remains of four infants, three children, an adolescent and an adult. The mound was then completed
with a layer of "small chalk grit" and a thinner layer of "Blue
Kimmeridge clay".


Phase IV


Subsequent to the construction of the primary mound, 53 cremations were
inserted into the crest of it. None of the cremated remains were enclosed
in vessels, but instead occurred in heaps 6-18 inches (15-45 centimetres)
in diameter and 1-6 inches (2-15 centimetres) high. Because not all of
the barrow was excavated, Mortimer considered it possible that there were
equally as many cremations preserved in the untouched part of the mound.
The cremations were unaccompanied by artefacts except for three fragments
of burnt bone pin.


Phase V


The barrow was subsequently enlarged by the addition of "roughly
quarried chalk" to create the massive final mound.

Later the mound was used as the emplacement for a post-mill.

Kinnes and his colleagues see Duggleby Howe as a cemetery used
over a long period of time, representing a stratified funerary sequence for
the Late Neolithic. Roy Loveday has suggested, as did J.R. Mortimer, that in fact the many burials may represent instead a sacrifice to mark the
death of a powerful figure, perhaps the individual found at the base
of the original shaft grave.

Mortimer's excavation technique, although good for the time, has not
recorded the archaeological stratigraphy sufficiently well to allow this
question to be settled.


The Great Barrows of East Yorkshire



References

  • Kinnes, I., Schadla-Hall, T., Chadwick, P. and Dean, P., 1983, Duggleby Howe reconsidered, ''Archaeological Journal'' 140: pp 83-108

  • Loveday, R., 2002, Duggleby Howe revisited, ''Oxford Journal of Archaeology'' 21: pp 135-146

  • Manby, T.G., 1988, The Neolithic period in eastern Yorkshire, in Manby, T.G. (ed.) ''Archaeology in Eastern Yorkshire: Essays in Honour of T.C.M. Brewster''. John R. Collis: Sheffield.

  • Maule Cole, E., 1902, Duggleby Howe, ''Transactions of the East Riding Antiquarian Society'' IX: pp 57-61

  • Mortimer, J.R., 1905, ''Forty Years Researches in British and Saxon Burial Mounds of East Yorkshire''. A. Brown and Sons: London.

  • Riley, D.N., 1980, Recent air photographs of Duggleby Howe and the Ferrybridge henge, ''Yorkshire Archaeological Journal'' 52: pp 174-178