| Charles Benedict Davenport |
Article Index for Charles |
Website Links For Charles |
Information AboutCharles Benedict Davenport |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT CHARLES DAVENPORT | |
| harvard university alumni | |
| davenport, charles | |
| american science writers | |
| american biologists | |
| davenport, charles benedict | |
| american eugenicists | |
| 1866 births | |
| 1944 deaths | |
| SHOPPER'S DELIGHT | |
|
Charles Benedict Davenport ( June 1 , 1866 – February 18 , 1944 ) was a prominent American Biologist and Eugenicist . BIOGRAPHY Davenport was born in Stamford , Connecticut . He went to Harvard, getting a PhD in biology in 1892 . He married in 1894 . He became an instructor of Zoology at Harvard University . In his biological work, Davenport became known as one of the most prominent American biologists of his age, pioneering attempts at developing quantitative standards of Taxonomy . Davenport had a tremendous respect for the biometric approach to evolution pioneered by Francis Galton and Karl Pearson , and sat on the editorial committee of Pearson's journal, '' Biometrika ''. However after the "re-discovery" of Gregor Mendel 's laws of heredity, he became a strict convert and major participant in the Mendelian school of genetics. He became director of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in 1910, where he founded the Eugenics Record Office . He began to study Human Heredity , and a large amount of his efforts were later turned in order to promote Eugenics . His 1911 book, '' Heredity In Relation To Eugenics '', was a major work in the history of American eugenics, and was used as a college textbook for many years. Davenport was elected to the National Academy Of Sciences the year after it was published. Davenport, along with an assistant, also attempted to develop a comprehensive quantitative approach to the question of Miscegenation , or, as he put it, "race crossing" in humans. The resulting work, published in 1929 , '' Race Crossing In Jamaica '', purported to give statistical evidence for biological and cultural degradation following interbreeding between white and black populations. It is today considered a work of Scientific Racism , and was criticized in its time for drawing conclusions which stretched far beyond (and sometimes counter) to the data it presented. SELECTED WORKS
EXTERNAL LINKS
|