Battle Of Karkar Article Index for
Battle Of
Website Links For
Battle
 

Information About

Battle Of Karkar




  caption Map showing the paths of the combatants
  partof the Assyrian conquest of Syria
  date 853 BCE
  place Northern Syria
  result Indecisive
  combatant1 Assyria
  combatant2 An alliance of 12 Kings
  commander1 Shalmaneser III
  commander2 Hadadezer
  strength1 Assyrian records claim 100,000 troops modern scholars believe Assyrian forces were smaller
  strength2 60,000 men, 2,450 chariots, 1,900 horsemen, and 10,000 camel riders


The Battle of Karkar (or '''Qarqar''') was fought in 853 BC when the army of Assyria , led by king Shalmaneser III , encountered an allied army of 12 kings at Karkar led by Hadadezer of Damascus . This battle is notable for having a larger number of combatants than any previous battle, and for being the first instance some peoples enter recorded history (such as the Arabs ). It is recorded on The Kurkh Monolith .

According to the inscription of Shalmaneser which he later erected, he had started his annual campaign, leaving Nineveh on the 14th day of Aiaru . He crossed both the Tigris and Euphrates without incident, receiving the submission and tribute of several cities along the way, including that of Aleppo . Once past Aleppo, he encountered his first resistance from troops of Iruleni , king of Hamath , whom he defeated; in retribution, he plundered both the palaces and the cities of Iruleni's kingdom. Continuing his march after having sacked Karkar , he encountered the allied forces near the Orontes River .

Shalmaneser's inscription describes the forces of his opponent Hadadezer in considerable detail as follows:

#Hadadezer himself commanded 1,200 chariots, 1,200 horsemen and 20,000 soldiers;
#Iruleni commanded 700 chariots, 700 horsemen and 10,000 soldiers;
#King Ahab of Israel sent 2,000 chariots and 10,000 soldiers;
#The land of ''Kizzuwadne'' ( Byblos ) sent 500 soldiers;
#The land of ''Musri'' sent 1,000 soldiers;
#King Irqanata sent 10 chariots and 10,000 soldiers;
#King Matinu-ba'lu of Arwad sent 200 soldiers;
#King Usannata sent 200 soldiers;
#King Adunu-ba'lu of Shianu sent 30 chariots and "thousands" of soldiers;
#King Gindibu of Arabia sent 10,000 Camel -riders;
#King Ba'asa , son of Ruhubi , of the Ammonites sent "hundreds" of soldiers;

Notes:

#''Musri'' ( Akkadian for "march") is usually translated here as "Egypt"; however, beginning with H. Winckler (''Alttestamentliche Untersuchen'', Leipzig: 1892), some translators believe this name refers to a northern Syrian territory near ''Kizzuwadne''.
#There is no mention of this battle in either Kings or Chronicles .
#Where the number in the inscription has been damaged, the approximate amount has been listed here.

Shalmaneser boasts that his troops inflicted 14,000 casualties upon the allied army, capturing countless chariots and horses, and describes the damage he inflicted on his opponents in savage detail. However, the inscriptions of kings from this period never acknowledge defeats, and sometimes claim victories those won by ancestors or predecessors. If Shalmaneser had won a clear victory at Karkar, it did not immediately enable further Assyrian conquests in Syria. Assyrian records make it clear that he campaigned in the region several more times in the following decade, engaging Hadadezer six times, who was supported by Iruleni of Hamath at least twice. Shalmaneser's opponents held on to their thrones after this battle: Hadadezer was king of Damascus until at least 841 BC , while Ahab was king of Israel until around 850 BC .

The relevant text in the Bible is an example of deep literary sarcasm. Precisely where you would expect the Battle of Karkar to appear, there is instead the spectacularly petty and unflattering incident involving Naboth's vineyard (1 Kings 21). The effect is to say, "You know about King Ahab and his role in the mighty coalation that stood up to Shalmanesser. But let me tell you what kind of man he ''really'' was--covetous, impotent, henpecked, godless, and cruel." A writer who wished to use the same literary technique today could, for instance, offer an account of John F. Kennedy's presidency that omitted the Cuban Missle Crisis and instead described a particularly tawdry extramarital tryst right at that point in the narrative.