| Baathist |
Website Links For Party |
Information AboutBaathist |
|
The Arab Socialist Ba'th Party (also spelled Baath or Ba'ath; as a radical, secular Arab nationalist political party. It functioned as a Pan-Arab party with branches in different Arab countries, but was strongest in Syria and Iraq , coming to power in both countries in 1963 . In 1966 the Syrian and Iraqi parties split into two rival organisations. Both Ba'th parties retained the same name and maintain parallel structures in the Arab world. While it was controlled by the Sunni minority and ruling the Shi'a majority in Iraq, the Baath Party is controlled by the Alawite minority in Syria and rules the Sunni majority. The Ba'th Party came to power in Syria through a "coup d'etat" (as usual in this country) on 8 March 1963 and attained a monopoly of political power later that year. The Ba'thists ruled Iraq briefly in 1963, and then from July 1968 until 2003 . After the ''de facto'' deposition of President Saddam Hussein 's Ba'thist regime in the course of the 2003 Iraq War , the occupying authorities banned the Iraqi Ba'th Party in June 2003 . The Arabic word ''Ba'th'' means "resurrection" or " Renaissance " as in the party's founder Michel Aflaq 's published works "On The Way Of Resurrection". Ba'thist beliefs combine Arab Socialism , Nationalism , and Pan-Arabism . The mostly secular ideology often contrasts with that of other Arab governments in the Middle East , which sometimes tend to have leanings towards Islamism and Theocracy . Due to the party's mixture of strong nationalism with socialism, some have labelled the Ba'th Party a Fascist movement, though this definition is hotly disputed and the subject of much debate. The motto of the Party is "Unity, Freedom, Socialism" (in Arabic ''wahda, hurriya, ishtirakiya''). "Unity" refers to Arab unity, "freedom" emphasizes freedom from foreign control and interference in particular, and "socialism" refers to what has been termed Arab Socialism rather than to Marxism . Practically, the Baathist Party was mainly a political framework that allowed the accession of dictators to power in several Arab countries. By monopolizing power and controlling freedom of speech in these countries, the Party was institutionalizing a "police state" and establishing a reign of terror on the Arab populations. The Baathist Party was responsible for multiple genocides against innocent Arab populations. In 1982, the Syrian Baathist Party of Hafez Al-Assad massacred more than 20,000 Syrian citizens in the town of Hama. The Hama massacre was aimed at controlling the Muslim Brotherhood movement that was opposed to the policies of the Baathist Party. The massacre of Hama allowed the ruling party to suppress the Muslim Brotherhood from the Syrian political life, and to terrorise any political party that would dare challenging the Baathist regime. The same criminal methodologies were employed by the Iraqi Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein that committed several genocides against the Kurdish and the Shi'a Iraqi populations. The Baathist Party is completely opposed to any form of democracy. For example, during the rule of the Baathist regime, Syria never experienced any free presidential election. There was always a unique candidate (Hafez Al-Assad), and he always won the elections with 99.99% of the votes. If any candidate dared to present his nomination against Assad, he was directly killed by the powerful Syrian intelligence. In the Baathist regime, the ruler should always be succeeded by his son. Hafez Al-Assad was preparing his son Bassel to succeed him. But Bassel died "mysteriously" in a road accident. So, the second son of Hafez Al-Assad, Bashar - a dentist - was appointed by the Party to succeed his father, even though he did not have the minimum requirements or experience to become a successful President. The same practice was followed by Saddam Hussein who was preparing one of his sons Oudai or Qussai to succeed him. By setting an ideology that does not accept any form of opposition, the Baathist Party was in fact forbidding popular participation in decision-making, and discouraging the emergence of new ideas. The results of this policy was catastrophic for the socio-economic development of the Arab countries. The existence of a unique ideology is considered as the main reason behind the failure of the Baathist regimes to face the Israeli expansion in the Arab world. Since the Baathist regimes did not allow '''free thinkers''' to participate in the political life and in the decision making process, the Baathist Arab countries were not able to generate new ideas and set up efficient strategies to fight Israel. They were blocked by their own ideology that they claim "could provide answers to all issues related to the Arab-Israeli conflict". This negative attitude of the Baathist regimes prevented the participation of all the educated Arab populations in the struggle against Israel. In fact, instead of allowing the population to participate freely in the political system, and to contribute to the development of national and pan-Arab strategies to face the Zionists, the Baathist regimes were busy in controlling their populations and terrorising them. Therefore, the Arab intellectuals were more inclined to think about the reform of the political system and the improvement of human rights conditions in their countries, instead of focusing on the main issue, which is struggle against Israel and the defense of Arab interests. ORIGINS The Ba'th party originated with two separate nationalist groups in Syria. The first of these, initially known as ''harakat al-ihyaa al-'arabi'' (the Arab Resurrection Movement), was set up by Michel Aflaq and Salah Al-Din Al-Bitar in 1940s. It was a relatively small group of intellectuals and students, and Aflaq was its main theoretician. His ideology was essentially a form of romantic nationalism coupled with a vague socialism which rejected, however, the idea of Class Struggle . The second group formed around Zaki Al-Arsuzi , a prominent figure in the resistance to French plans to annex the Syrian province of Iskandarun to Turkey. Al-Arsuzi's conception of the Arab nation was essentially a linguistic one, and historian Hanna Batatu also charges him with racialism and a mystical tendency influenced by his Alawite religion. According to some sources, in 1940 Arsuzi founded a group known as ''al-ba'th al-'arabi'' (the Arab Resurrection); in other sources, he only used this as the name of a bookshop he opened in Damascus . In any case, he seems to have been the first to adopt the name. Al-Bitar and Aflaq were from bourgeois Damascus families, the former a Muslim and the latter an Orthodox Christian . Both had studied in Paris , coming under the influence of European nationalist and Marxist ideas. The two men, along with al-Arsuzi and another major proponent of early Ba'thist ideology, Shakeeb Dallal , had careers as middle-class educators. These groups had formed in opposition to both French colonial rule and to the older generation of Syrian Arab nationalists, and advocated instead Pan-Arab Unity and Arab Nationalism . Their ideology blended non- Marxist socialism and nationalism. The early Syrian Ba'thists opposed the influence of Europe in their country's affairs, and used nationalism and the notion of unifying the Arab world as a platform. FOUNDATION OF THE ARAB BA'TH PARTY In 1944 , al-Arsuzi was deserted by most of his supporters, the bulk of whom, led by Wahib Al-Ghanim , joined the Aflaq-al-Bitar group in 1945 . The Arab Ba'th Party came into existence the same year, when its first central committee was formed. Aflaq and al-Bitar were its leaders. The party was officially established two years later at its first party congress, held in Damascus on April 7 , 1947 . It remained a relatively small party, with a following essentially among intellectuals, until it merged with the Arab Socialist Party of Akram Al-Hawrani in 1952 . The party's name was changed to the Arab Socialist Ba'th Party, while the constitution and rules of Aflaq and al-Bitar's party were adopted unchanged. A new national command was elected, composed of Aflaq, al-Bitar, al-Hawrani, and Antun Maqdisi , a supporter of al-Hawrani. In 1954 the second party congress ratified the merger. Al-Hawrani was a popular figure known for his campaigns against the feudal landlordism prevalent in Hama province and his participation in the Rashid Ali movement in Iraq and resistance to Zionism in Palestine . His support gave the Ba'th both a wider popular base and a foothold in the officer corps of the Syrian military. However, this was at best a mixed blessing: Batatu records that many of his followers retained a personal loyalty to him rather than becoming committed party men. The Ba'th claimed to speak for the entire Arab nation and in the course of the 1950 s its influence spread to other Arab countries, with branches forming in Iraq , Jordan , and Lebanon . It was soon to play a prominent role in the turbulent politics of both Syria and Iraq in the 1950s and 1960s, a role that by the end of the 1960 s would lead it to power in both countries but also ultimately to its transformation from a competitive, ideological political party into an instrument of rule in one-party regimes in both countries. THE BA'TH IN SYRIA, 1954 - 1963 Syrian politics took a dramatic turn in 1954 when the military regime of Adib Al-Shishakli was overthrown and a democratic system restored. The Ba'th, now a large and popular organisation, gained representation in the parliamentary elections that year. Ideologically-based organisations appealing to the Intelligentsia , the Petty Bourgeoisie and the working class were gaining ground in Syria, threatening to displace the old parties that represented the notables and bourgeoisie. The Ba'th was one of these new formations, but faced considerable competition from ideological enemies, notably the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP), which was intrinsically opposed to Arab nationalism and was seen as pro-Western, and the Syrian Communist Party (SCP), whose support for class struggle and internationalism was also anathema to the Ba'th. In addition to the parliamentary level, all these parties as well as Islamist s competed in street-level activity and sought to recruit support among the military. The assassination of Ba'thist colonel Adnan Al-Malki by a member of the SSNP allowed the Ba'th and its allies to launch a crackdown on that party, thus eliminating one rival, but by the late 1950s the Ba'th itself was facing considerable problems, riven by factionalism and faced with ideological confusion among its base. The growth of the Communist Party was also a major threat. These considerations undoubtedly contributed to the party's decision to support unification with Nasser 's Egypt in 1958 , an extremely popular position in any case. In 1958 Syria merged with Egypt in the United Arab Republic . As political parties other than Nasser's Arab Socialist Union were not permitted to operate, the Ba'th along with Syria's other parties faced the choice of dissolution or suppression. In August 1959 the Ba'th Party held a congress which, in line with Aflaq's views, approved of its liquidation into the Arab Socialist Union. This decision was not universally accepted in party ranks, however, and the following year a fourth party congress was convened which reversed it. Meanwhile, a small group of Syrian Ba'thist officers stationed in Egypt were observing with alarm the party's poor position and the increasing fragility of the union. They decided to form a secret military committee: its initial members were Lieutenant-Colonel Muhammad 'Umran , majors Salah Jadid and Ahmad Al-Mir , and captains Hafez Al-Assad and 'Abd Al-Karim Al-Jundi The merger was not a happy experience for Syria, and in and gaining considerable support. The leadership around Aflaq was bitterly contested for its timidity in opposing the separation. Al-Hawrani, now a determined opponent of reunification, left the Ba'th and re-established his Arab Socialist Party. Aflaq sought to reactivate the splintered party by calling a Fifth National Congress held in Homs in May 1962 , from which both al-Hawrani's supporters and the Socialist Unity Vanguard were excluded. A compromise was reached between the pro-Nasser elements and the more cautious leadership. The leadership line was reflected in the position the congress adopted in favour of "considered unity" as opposed to the demands for "immediate unity" launched by the Socialist Unity Vanguard (later the Socialist Unity Movement), the Nasserists and the Arab Nationalist Movement . Meanwhile the Syrian party's secret Military Committee was also planning how to take power, having been granted considerable freedom of action by the civilian leadership in recognition of its need for secrecy. THE BA'TH TAKES POWER IN SYRIA AND IRAQ, 1963 In February 1963, the Iraqi Ba'th took power after bloodily overthrowing Abd Al-Karim Qasim and quashing communist-led resistance. That same year, the Syrian party's military committee succeeded in persuading Nasserist and independent officers to make common cause with it, and they successfully carried out a military coup on 8 March . A National Revolutionary Command Council took control and assigned itself legislative power; it appointed Salah al-Din al-Bitar as head of a "national front" government. The Ba'th participated in this government along with the Arab Nationalist Movement, the United Arab Front and the Socialist Unity Movement. As historian Hanna Batatu notes, this took place without the fundamental disagreement over immediate or "considered" reunification having been resolved. The Ba'th moved to consolidate its power within the new regime, purging Nasserist officers in April. Subsequent disturbances led to the fall of the al-Bitar government, and in the aftermath of Jasim Alwan 's failed Nasserist coup in July, the Ba'th monopolised power. IDEOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION AND DIVISION, 1963 - 1966 The challenges of building a Ba'thist state led to considerable ideological discussion and internal struggle in the party. The Iraqi party was increasingly dominated by Ali Salih Al-Sa'di , an unsophisticated thinker according to Batatu, who took a hardline leftist approach, declaring himself a Marxist. He gained support in this from Syrian regional secretary Mahmud Al-Shufi and from Yasin Al-Hafiz , one of the party's few ideological theorists. Some members of the secret military committee also sympathised with this line. The far-left tendency gained control at the party's Sixth National Congress of 1963 , where hardliners from the dominant Syrian and Iraqi regional parties joined forces to impose a hard left line, calling for "socialist planning", "collective farms run by peasants", "workers' democratic control of the means of production", a party based on workers and peasants, and other demands reflecting a certain emulation of Soviet-style socialism. In a coded attack on Aflaq, the congress also condemned "ideological notability" within the party (Batatu, p. 1020). Aflaq, bitterly angry at this transformation of his party, retained a nominal leadership role, but the National Command as a whole came under the control of the radicals. The volte-face was received with anger by elements in the Iraqi party, which suffered considerable internal division. The Nationalist Guard, a paramilitary unit which had been extremely effective, and extremely brutal, in suppressing opposition to the new regime, supported al-Sa'di, as did the Ba'thist Federation of Students, the Union of Workers, and the bulk of the membership. Most party members among the military officer corps were opposed, as was President Abd Al-Salam 'Arif . Coup and counter-coup ensued within the party, whose factions did not shrink from employing the military in settling their internal differences. This eventually allowed 'Arif to take control and eliminate Ba'thist power in Iraq for the time being. BA'THIST POWER IN SYRIA From 1963, the Ba'th functioned as the only legal Syrian political party, but factionalism and splintering within the party led to a succession of governments and new constitutions. On 23 February 1966 a military Junta led by Salah Jadid took power, and set out on a more radical line. Although they had not been supporters of the victorious far-left line at the Sixth Party Congress, they had now moved to adopt its positions and displaced the more moderate wing in power, purging from the party its original founders, Aflaq and al-Bitar. At this juncture the Syrian Ba'th party split into two factions: the "progressive" faction, led by , as essential for Syria's strategic position. Despite constant maneuvering and government changes, the two factions remained in an uneasy coalition of power until 1970, when, in another coup, Assad succeeded in ousting Atassi as prime minister. The Ba'th Party in Syria became virtually indistinguishable from the state, with membership numbers well over one million reflecting the fact that party membership was vital to advancement in many sectors. Other socialist parties accepting the basic orientation of the regime were permitted to operate again, and in 1973 the National Progressive Front was established as a coalition of the legal parties; the Ba'th remained firmly in control. Meanwhile, supporters of the far-left line formed the Democratic Arab Socialist Ba'th Party , which remains in existence to this day as an illegal opposition party in Syria and in exile. The Syrian Ba'th and the Iraqi Ba'th were by now two separate parties, each maintaining that it was the genuine party and electing a National Command to take charge of the party across the Arab world. However, in Syria the Regional Command was the real centre of party power, and the membership of the National Command was a largely honorary position, often the destination of figures being eased out of the leadership. Assad, one of the longest-ruling leaders of the modern Middle East , remained at Syria's political helm until his death in 2000 , when his son Bashar Al Assad succeeded him as President and as Regional Secretary of the party. The Ba'th holds 135 of the 250 seats in the Syrian parliament, a figure which is dictated by election regulations rather than by voting patterns. The party outside Syria The Syria-based Ba'th Party has branches in Lebanon , Yemen , Jordan , Sudan , Iraq (currently split into two factions), etc., although none of the non-Syrian branches have any major strength. Among the Palestinians, '' As-Sa'iqa '', a member organization of the Palestine Liberation Organisation , is the Syrian Ba'th party branch. In Lebanon the party is led by Asem Qanso , a Shiite worker of Kurdish descent. THE IRAQ-BASED BA'TH PARTY Iraqi and Syrian Ba'thism today differ widely and partially oppose each other, though they only split a long time after their creation. They share one common feature in that under Saddam Hussein Iraq also moved away from Ba'thist principles. History In Iraq the Ba'th party remained a civilian group and lacked strong support within the military. The party had little impact, and the movement split into several factions after 1958 and again in 1966. It lacked strong popular support, but through the construction of a strong party apparatus the party succeeded in gaining power. The Ba'thists first came to power in the coup of February, 1963, when Abd al-Salam 'Arif became president. Interference from the historic leadership around Aflaq and disputes between the moderates and extremists, culminating in an attempted coup by the latter in November, 1963, served to discredit the party. After Arif's takeover in November 1963, the moderate military Ba'thist officers initially retained some influence but were gradually eased out of power over the following months. In July, 1968, a bloodless coup brought to power the Ba'thist general Ahmad Hassan Al-Bakr . Wranglings within the party continued, and the government periodically Purge d its dissident members. Emerging as a party strongman, Saddam Hussein eventually used his growing power to push al-Bakr aside in 1979 and ruled Iraq until 2003. Although almost all the Ba'thist leadership had no military background, under Hussein the party changed dramatically and became heavily militarized, with its leading members frequently appearing in uniform. Structure The Party cell or circle, composed of three to seven members, constitutes the basic organisational unit of the Iraqi Ba'th Party. Cells functioned at the neighborhood or village level, where members would meet to discuss and execute party directives introduced from above. Since individual cells had little contact with one another, those higher up could vigorously enforce party loyalties from the top down. As the U.S. and its allies discovered in Iraq in 2003, cell organization also made the Party highly resilient. A Party division comprised two to seven cells, controlled by a division commander. Such Ba'thist cells occurred throughout the bureaucracy and the military, where they functioned as the Party's watchdog, an effective form of covert surveillance within a public administration. A Party section, which comprised two to five divisions, functioned at the level of a large city quarter, a town, or a rural district. The branch came above the sections; it comprised at least two sections, and operated at the provincial level. The Party congress, which combined all the branches, elected the regional command as the core of the Party leadership and top decision-making mechanism. The national command of the Ba'th Party ranked over the regional command. It formed the highest policy-making and coordinating council for the Ba'th movement throughout the Arab world at large. Post-Saddam Hussein In June 2003, the multinational Occupying forces in Iraq banned the Ba'th party. Some criticize the additional step the CPA took — of banning all members of the Ba'th party from the new government, as well as from Public School s and College s — as blocking too many skilled people from participation in the new government. Several teachers have lost their jobs, causing protests and demonstrations at School s and Universities . Under the previous rule of the Ba'th party, one could not reach high positions in the government or in the schools without becoming a party member. Many members and supporters of the former Ba'th Party are involved in the Iraqi Insurgency . They are most active and draw most of their support from within the Sunni Triangle . However after the capture of Saddam Hussein most Ba'thist groups have started to take up a more Islamist character in a bid to increase their support. The party outside Iraq The Iraq-based Ba'th Party had branches in various Arab countries, such as Lebanon , Mauritania and Jordan . After the fall of the Saddam government, many branches have distanced themselves from the central party, such as the branches in Yemen and Sudan . In Lebanon , the party is led by Liberal Sunni MP for Tripoli Abdul-Majeed Al-Rafei and Nicola Y. Firzli , Beirut-based real estate entrepreneur and scion of a prominent Greek-Orthodox clan that fought against Ottoman Turkish rule in the Middle East . The branch amongst the Palestinians bears the name of ''Jabhat al-Tahrir al-'Arabiyah'' (the Arab Liberation Front , or ALF). ALF formed the major Palestinian political faction in Iraq during the Saddam years. In Bahrain , Rasul al-Jishi leads the local faction of the Ba'th Party, the Nationalist Democratic Rally Society (''Jami'at al-Tajammu' al-Qawmi al-Dimuqrati''), which in an alliance with radical Islamists opposes the Bahrain government's political reforms. An Iraq-oriented Ba'th Party branch formerly existed in Syria , which the Syrian government severely repressed. It was led by former Sunni president Ameen-al-Hafiz who returned to Aleppo in 2003, after having lived in exile in Iraq for more than three decades. REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS
|