Afro-asiatic

The Afro-Asiatic languages constitute a Language Family with about 240 languages and over 307 million speakers spread throughout North Africa , East Africa , the Sahel , and Southwest Asia . Other names sometimes given to this family include "Afrasian", "Hamito-Semitic" (deprecated), "Lisramic" (Hodge 1972), "Erythraean" (Tucker 1966).

The family includes the following language subfamilies:

Berber Languages

Chadic Languages

Egyptian Language s

Semitic Languages

Cushitic Languages

Beja Language (subclassification controversial; widely classified as part of Cushitic)

Omotic Languages (controversial; sometimes argued to be outside Afro-Asiatic)

Many people regard the Ongota language as Afro-Asiatic, but its classification within the family remains controversial, partly for lack of data. Harold Fleming tentatively suggests treating it as an independent branch of non-Omotic Afro-Asiatic.

No general agreement exists on where Proto-Afro-Asiatic was spoken. Some scholars (such as Igor Diakonoff and Lionel Bender , for example) have proposed Africa , particularly Ethiopia , because it includes the majority of the diversity of the Afro-Asiatic language family and has very diverse groups in close geographic proximity, often considered a tell-tale sign for a linguistic geographic origin. Other researchers (such as Christopher Ehret , for example) have put forward the western Red Sea coast and the Sahara . Alexander Militarev suggests a linguistic homeland in the Levant (specifically, he identifies Afro-Asiatic with the Natufian Culture ).

The Semitic languages form the only Afro-Asiatic subfamily based outside of Africa. Some scholars believe that, in historical or near-historical times, Semitic speakers crossed from South Arabia back into Ethiopia and Eritrea, while others, such as A. Murtonen , dispute this view, suggesting that the Semitic Language classification may have originated in Ethiopia .

Tonal Language s appear in the Omotic, Chadic, and South and East Cushitic branches of Afro-Asiatic, according to Ehret (1996). The Semitic, Berber and Egyptian branches do not use tones phonemically.

COMMON FEATURES AND COGNATES

Common features of the Afro-Asiatic languages include:

a two- Gender system in the singular, with the feminine marked by the /t/ sound,

VSO Typology with SVO tendencies,

a set of Emphatic Consonant s, variously realized as glottalized, pharyngealized, or implosive, and

a Templatic Morphology in which words inflect by internal changes as well as with prefixes and suffixes.

Some cognates include:

''b-n-'' "build" (Ehret: ---''bĭn''), attested in Chadic, Semitic (''---bny''), Cushitic (---''mĭn''/---''măn'' "house") and Omotic (Dime ''bin-'' "build, create");

''m-t'' "die" (Ehret: ---''maaw''), attested in Chadic (e.g. Hausa ''mutu''), Egyptian (''mwt'', ''mt'', Coptic ''mu''), Berber (''mmet'', pr. ''yemmut''), Semitic (---''mwt''), and Cushitic (Proto-Somali ---''umaaw''/---''-am-w(t)-'' "die"), also similar to the PIE base ---mor-/mr-, "die," evidence in favor of both the Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European language families' classification in the hypothetical Nostratic superfamily

''s-n'' "know", attested in Chadic, Berber, and Egyptian;

''l-s'' "tongue" (Ehret: ''---lis' ''"to lick"), attested in Semitic (---''lasaan/lisaan''), Egyptian (''ns'', Coptic ''las''), Berber (''ils''), Chadic (eg Hausa ''harshe''), and possibly Omotic (Dime ''lits'-'' "lick");

''s-m'' "name" (Ehret: ---''sŭm'' / ---''sĭm''), attested in Semitic (---''sm''), Berber (''ism''), Chadic (eg Hausa ''suna''), Cushitic, and Omotic (though some see the Berber form, ''ism'', and the Omotic form, ''sunts'', as Semitic Loanword s.) The Egyptian ''smi'' "report, announce" may also be cognate.

''d-m'' "blood" (Ehret: ---''dîm'' / ---''dâm''), attested in Berber (''idammen''), Semitic (---''dam''), Chadic, and arguably Omotic. Cushitic ---''dîm''/---''dâm'', "red", may be cognate.

In the verbal system, Semitic, Berber, and Cushitic (including Beja) all provide evidence for a prefix conjugation:

All Afro-Asiatic subfamilies show evidence of a causative affix ''s'', but a similar suffix also appears in other groups, such as the Niger-Congo Languages .

Semitic, Berber, Cushitic (including Beja), and Chadic support Possessive Pronoun suffixes.

CLASSIFICATION HISTORY

Medieval scholars sometimes linked two or more branches of Afro-Asiatic together; as early as the 9th Century the Hebrew grammarian Judah Ibn Quraysh of Tiaret in Algeria perceived a relationship between Berber and Semitic (the latter group known to him through Arabic, Hebrew, and Aramaic.)

In the course of the 19th century Europeans also began suggesting such relationships; thus in 1844 Th. Benfey suggested a language family containing Semitic, Berber, and Cushitic (calling the latter "Ethiopic"). In the same year, T. N. Newman suggested a relationship between Semitic and Hausa, but this would long remain a topic of dispute and uncertainty. Friedrich Müller named the traditional "Hamito-Semitic" family in 1876 in his ''Grundriss der Sprachwissenschaft'', and defined it as consisting of a Semitic group plus a "Hamitic" group containing Egyptian, Berber, and Cushitic; he excluded the Chadic group. These classifications relied in part on non-linguistic anthropological and racial arguments. (See also Hamitic Hypothesis .)

Leo Reinisch (1909) proposed to link Cushitic and Chadic, while urging a more distant affinity with Egyptian and Semitic, thus foreshadowing Greenberg; but his suggestion found little resonance. Marcel Cohen (1924) rejected the idea of a distinct "Hamitic" subgroup, and included Hausa (a Chadic language) in his comparative Hamito-Semitic vocabulary. Joseph Greenberg (1950) strongly confirmed Cohen's rejection of "Hamitic", added (and sub-classified) the Chadic languages, and proposed the new name Afro-Asiatic for the family; almost all scholars accepted his classification. In 1969 Harold Fleming proposed the recognition of Omotic as a fifth branch, rather than (as previously believed) a subgroup of Cushitic, and this has met with general acceptance. Several scholars, including Harold Fleming and Robert Hetzron , have since questioned the traditional inclusion of Beja in Cushitic, but this view has yet to gain general acceptance.

Little agreement exists on the sub-classification of the five or six branches mentioned; however, Christopher Ehret (1979), Harold Fleming (1981), and Joseph Greenberg (1981) all agree that the Omotic branch to split from the rest first. Otherwise:

Ehret groups Egyptian, Berber, and Semitic together in a North Afro-Asiatic subgroup;

Paul Newman (1980) groups Berber with Chadic and Egyptian with Semitic, while questioning the inclusion of Omotic;

Fleming (1981) divided non-Omotic Afroasiatic, or "Erythraean", into three groups, Cushitic, Semitic, and Chadic-Berber-Egyptian; he later added Semitic and Beja to the latter, and proposed Ongotá as a tentative new third branch of Erythraean;

Lionel Bender (1997) advocates a "Macro-Cushitic" consisting of Berber, Cushitic, and Semitic, while regarding Chadic and Omotic as the most remote branches;

Vladimir Orel and Olga Stolbova (1995) group Berber with Semitic, group Chadic with Egyptian, and split Cushitic into five or more independent branches of Afro-Asiatic, seeing Cushitic as a Sprachbund rather than a valid family;

Alexander Militarev (2000), on the basis of Lexicostatistics , groups Berber with Chadic and both, more distantly, with Semitic, as against Cushitic and Omotic.

Information About

Afro-asiatic