| United States V. Bhagat Singh Thind |
Article Index for United States |
Website Links For United States |
Information AboutUnited States V. Bhagat Singh Thind |
|
THE BENCH Opinion # Written by: Associate Justice George Sutherland Sutherland found that while Indians were indeed anthropologically Caucasian, the framers of the Constitution could never have intended letting Bhagat Singh Thind enter the country and be naturalized. Sutherland commented "the average man knows perfectly well that there are unmistakable and profound differences", leveraging the common man's understanding of Caucasian, meaning white, and hence Thind could not be eligible for citizenship since he looked distinctively different from this common man's notion. Rather than create a new classification, Sutherland found Indians to be Asian, subjecting them to preexisting anti-Asian laws passed nationally and in California under the heavy lobbying of the AEL (Asiatic Exclusion League). EFFECTS OF THE DECISION Not only were Indians denied the ability to naturalize, their new classification as Asian rather than white allowed retroactively stripping previously naturalized Indians of their American citizenship since zealous prosecutors argued Indian Americans had gained citizenship illegally, a claim often upheld. Moreover, without citizenship, Indian land owners fell under the net of the California Alien Land Law , and other racist laws spearheaded by growing hatred against Asian immigrants. Specifically, Attorney General Ulysses S. Webb was very active in revoking Indian land purchases and in a bid to further strengthen the AEL, he promised to prevent Indians from buying or leasing land. Under intense pressures, and with The Barred Zone Act Of 1917 preventing fresh immigration to strengthen the fledgling Indian American community, most Indians left the United States, leaving only half their population, 2,405, by 1940. Ironically, and suggestive of the poor coordination within the legal system of the early 20th century, Thind applied for and received U.S. citizenship through the state of New York a few years after his original U.S. citizenship was revoked by the U.S. Supreme Court. Numerous other instances exist of naive clerks, or clerks acting in protest, who granted citizenship in defiance of the Supreme Court. Enthusiastic anti-Indian sentiments seemed fairly absent in New England. As public support for Indians grew throughout World War II , and as India's independence came closer to reality, Indians argued for an end to their legislative discrimination. The repeal of Chinese exclusion laws in 1943 and the granting of naturalization privileges to Chinese encouraged Indians to hope for similar gains. Hurdling past many Members of Congress and the American Federation of Labor who vehemently opposed removing legislative measures barricading Indian immigration and naturalization, the Indian community succeeded in gaining support among several prominent Congressmen as well as President Franklin D. Roosevelt . The support culminated in the signing into law by President Truman on July 2, 1946, the Luce-Celler Act . This Act reversed the Thind decision, insofar as allowing naturalization to Indians, and set a token quota for their immigration at 100 per year. EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|