Information AboutUfology |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT UFOLOGY | |
| ufos | |
| topics in ufology | |
| ufologistsufos | |
| topics in ufology | |
| ufologists | |
|
BACKGROUND AND LEGITIMACY While many ufologists strive for legitimacy, and some are respected scientists in other fields, ufology has never been fully embraced by the scientific community, for a number of reasons. Despite involvement of some respected scientists, the field has seen very little attention from mainstream science. Most critics still consider ufology a Pseudoscience or a Protoscience . (For more on applications of science to UFO phenomena, see "Science and UFOs" in Unidentified Flying Objects .) One cannot obtain a "ufology" degree from any College or University , though there have been a few college or university courses on the subject, often from a Folklore perspective. Many ufologists are amateurs (or alternatively, individuals in search of fame and fortune), and however well intentioned, are often unfamiliar with generally accepted research standards, thus often rendering their own research useless even to sympathetic mainstream experts. Many amateur ufologists have been criticised for accepting as true stories or tales without demanding supporting evidence or conducting even cursory research. Ufologists embrace a wide spectrum of approaches, beliefs, and attitudes, from those regarded by some as Quack s (e.g. David Icke ); to respected mainstream scientists like Peter A. Sturrock , J. Allen Hynek , James E. McDonald , or Auguste Meessen , some of whom argue that UFO reports are as worthy of study as any topic, and deserve Case-by-case Analysis using the Scientific Method . Debunk ers (such as Philip Klass or Dr. Donald Menzel ) have offered their opinions on UFOs, and though their conclusions have been disputed, they too represent an influential perspective in UFO studies. However, this classification (sometimes presented as "skeptics" vs. "believers") is something of a , for example, was quite skeptical of any extraordinary answer to the UFO question, but in 1969, he co-organised a Symposium on the subject, thinking that science had unfairly neglected the UFO question. Overall, Ufology might be seen as an Interdisciplinary field, as people have examined UFO reports from a number of perspectives. In her critique of the Condon Report , Diana Palmer Hoyt notes that "The UFO problem seems to bear a closer resemblance to problems in Meteorology than in Physics . The phenomena are observed, occur episodically, are not reproducible, and in large part, are identified by Statistical gathering of data for possible organization into patterns. They are not experiments that can be replicated at will at the Laboratory bench under controlled conditions." (see external links below) Along these lines, Peter Sturrock suggests that UFO studies should be compartmentalized — as are most scientific endeavors — into at least "the following distinct activities: #Field investigations leading to case documentation and the measurement or retrieval of physical evidence; #Laboratory analysis of physical evidence; #The systematic compilation of data (descriptive and physical) to look for patterns and so extact significant facts; #The analysis of compilations of data (descriptive and physical) to look for patterns and so extract significant facts; #The development of theories and the evaluation of those theories on the basis of facts.” (Sturrock, 163) Study of UFO sightings ''has'' yielded results applicable to other fields, such as in weather phenomena (see Hessdalen ) and in human perception, such as the study lead by the SOBEPS for the Belgian flap in 1989-'90 or the studies of the GEPAN/SEPRA in France . Some argue this rejection by mainstream science is part of the problem: anyone can declare themselves a "UFO researcher", and completely bypass the sorts of Consensus building and Peer Review that otherwise shape and influence scientific Paradigms . This has allowed many to stake out territory and disseminate claims, information and analysis of widely varying rigor and quality. Some ufologists consider the general attitude of mainstream academics as arrogant and dismissive, or bound to a rigid World View that disallows any evidence contrary to previously held notions, despite the fact that the history of science is replete with discarded notions. Others charge that mainstream rejection of UFO evidence is a classic case of Pathological Science . Astronomer and ufologist J. Allen Hynek 's famous comment regarding this subject is, "Ridicule is not part of the Scientific Method and people should not be taught that it is." Another comment by Hynek regarding the frequent dismissal of UFO reports by astronomers was, "Close questioning revealed they knew nothing of the actual sightings... and therefore cannot be taken seriously. This is characteristic of scientists in general when speaking about subjects which are not in their own immediate field of concern." THE FUNDING PROBLEM Astrophysicist were to make available, say, $50 million per year for ten years for UFO research, it is quite likely that the subject would look somewhat less disreputable ... however, an agency is unlikely to initiate such a program at any level until scientists are supportive of such an initiative. We see that there is a chicken-and-egg program. It would be more sensible, and more acceptable to the scientific community, if research began at a low level." (Sturrock, 155) HYPOTHESES INVOLVING THE OBJECTIVE EXISTENCE OF UFOS These hypotheses speculate that the phenomena derives wholly or in part from a phenomena, rather than the mind of the observer. The Extraterrestrial Hypothesis The Extraterrestrial Hypothesis ('''ETH''') theorizes that some UFO sightings are Alien Spacecraft . A sub-theory, the Staging Hypothesis, prevalent up until the 1980s , speculated that extraterrestrials have "stage-managed" encounters as a deliberate policy to "educate" humanity. This theory has fallen out of favor, as its proponents then moved on to even less literal-minded interpetations. The advanced human aircraft hypothesis This is a theory that all or some UFO sightings are advanced, secret or experimental aircraft of earthly origin.
There is a theory that the secret groups developing these aircraft in the USA, have been encouraging ufology to follow the "alien spacecraft" line of thought, to cover up for sightings. The Interdimensional Hypothesis (a.k.a. "Cosmic Trickster", "Ultraterrestrial" Hypothesis) The Interdimensional Hypothesis has two meanings here. See Interdimensional Hypothesis .
Sky Critter Hypothesis The theory of Trevor James Contable (a.k.a. Trevor James) speculated that UFO sightings involve the sighting of exotic unknown life otherwise known as Sky Critters or '''Rods'''. UFOS AS PERCEPTION OR ILLUSION The natural explanation hypothesis This is a theory that most UFO sightings are misunderstood phenomena such as Ball Lightning or by a Visual Illusions . See Identified Flying Objects (IFOs) . Psychosocial Hypothesis This is a theory that some UFO sightings are Hallucination s or fantasies and are caused by the same mechanism as various Occult , Paranormal , Supernatural . or Religious experiences (compare alleged sightings of the Blessed Virgin Mary ). See article, Psychosocial Hypothesis . The hallucination may be a distortion of a real object. Reasons for these wrong perceptions include:
The route followed by these misperceptions can be influenced by the environment that the perceiver was brought up in as a child: where another sees Greys . GROUPS INVOLVED WITH UFOLOGY
SOURCES
SEE ALSO
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|