| The Destiny Of The Mother Church |
Article Index for The |
Website Links For Destiny |
Information AboutThe Destiny Of The Mother Church |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT THE DESTINY OF THE MOTHER CHURCH | |
| 1948 books | |
| destiny of the mother church, the | |
| 1991 books | |
| christian science texts | |
|
Knapp incorporated his teachings into an early book draft of ''Destiny'', subsequent to which the Christian Science Board Of Directors wrote him a six-page letter in February 1948 politely explaining and rebuking numerous points they regarded as at erroneous variance from Eddy's teaching. Knapp then withdrew the book, but instead of revising it as they proposed, he expanded it for private issue instead and left it in trust with approximately $100 million in 1990s dollars, acquired by way of marriage to Eloise Mabury, to revert to the Christian Science Church if it ever published his work as "authorized literature". Pressed for funds by its 1990s media ventures through the Christian Science Publishing Society , and in spite of its historical rejection of such a course, the church now acquiesced, to the strong surprise of its membership, arguing that the book did not have to bear the burden of theological correctness members historically had understood the "No Incorrect Literature" bylaw in the Manual Of The Mother Church to require. The church issued the book without annotation as Knapp's will demanded, ostensibly as part of a series of biographies of the church's founder. Oddly, the church indirectly acknowledged in a letter to Christian Science teachers, later amended, that it knew Knapp's views departed from Eddy's own; and Knapp, ironically, insistent on making theological arguments, had once emphasized the book was "in no sense the biography of anyone". Advised in fall 1991 before the book's publication by a six-page letter from church Archivist Lee Johnson of the book's unusual history, a large number of Christian Science branch churches voted not to carry the book or simply declined to order it, though precise figures are difficult to establish. The financial disbursement was contested by alternate beneficiaries Stanford University and the Los Angeles County Art Museum, ultimating in an approximately 50-25-25 negotiated settlement split (in apparent violation of Knapp's original mandate that his terms not be in any way disputed). The book's publication attracted a fair deal of unwelcome media attention and continued to be held by many members, in spite of the church's defense, to violate Eddy's basic teachings and the Church Manual , the church's equivalent of constitutional law. |
|
|