Resource-based View Website Links For
View
 

Information About

Resource-based View





CONCEPT


The key points of the theory are:

1) Identify the firm’s potential key resources

2) Evaluate whether these resources fulfil the following (virn) criterion:

  • Valuable - they enable a firm to implement strategies that improve its efficiency and effectiveness

  • Rare - not available to other competitors

  • Imperfectly imitable - not easily implemented by others

  • Non-substitutable - not able to be replaced by some other non-rare resource



3) Care for and protect resources that pass these evaluations


DEFINITIONS



What constitutes a "resource"?


Barney (1991, p101) - “firm resources include all Assets , Capabilities , organizational processes, firm attributes, information, knowledge, etc. controlled by a firm that enable the firm to conceive of and implement strategies that improve its efficiency and effectiveness”

Kay (1999) – “Resources are inputs into a firm's production process, such as capital, equipment, the skills of individual employees, patents, finance, and talented managers. Resources are either tangible or intangible in nature.”


What constitutes "competitive advantage"?


Barney (1991, p102) - A firm achieves Competitive Advantage when it is able to implement a “value creating strategy not simultaneously being implemented by any current or potential competitors”


CRITICISMS


Preim and Butler (2001) made four key criticisms:

  • The RBV is Tautological

  • Different resource configurations can generate the same value for firms and thus would not be competitive advantage

  • The role of product markets is underdeveloped in the argument

  • The theory has limited prescriptive implications


However, Barney (2001) proposed counter-arguments to these.

Further criticisms are:

  • It is perhaps difficult (if not impossible) to find a resource which satisfies all of the Barney's VRIN criterion.


  • There is the assumption that a firm can be profitable in a highly competitive market as long as it can exploit advantageous resources, but this may not necessarily be the case. It ignores external factors concerning the industry as a whole; Porter’s Industry Structure Analysis ought also be considered.




FURTHER READING


  • Professor Ibrahim Musa Senior Lecturer Strategic Management, Unpublished books archives, The Driving Forces Of the business world page 102 -107


  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993), "The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view". Strategic Managment Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 179-191


  • Rumelt, R. P. (1991), "How much does industry matter?". Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 167-185


  • Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management". Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533



SEE ALSO

Porter's Five Forces


REFERENCES


  • Barney, Jay B. (1991), "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage". Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120


  • Barney, Jay B. (2001), "Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes". Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 41-55


  • Todino A L. (2001) "Is Resource based view a useful tool in modern business". Journal for strategic management, vol 18 No 1, pp 77-103