Rpm Package Manager Article Index for
Rpm
Website Links For
Rpm
 

Information About

Rpm Package Manager




RPM in the context of package management refers to two things: a software package file format, and the original tool developed to manage those packages ('''RPM Package Manager''', originally called "Red Hat Package Manager"). RPM was primarily intended for Linux . The package management tool RPM installs, updates, uninstalls, verifies and queries Software . The file format RPM is the baseline package format of the Linux Standard Base .

Originally developed by Red Hat for Red Hat Linux , RPM is now used by many Linux Distribution s. It has also been ported to some other Operating System s such as Novell NetWare (since version 6.5 SP3) and IBM AIX since version 5, see RPM homepage for all supported platforms.

"RPM", as it is used today, is an example of a Recursive Acronym .


THE FILE FORMAT



THE RPM DATABASE


Working behind the scenes of package manager is the RPM database. It consists of a Doubly-linked List that contains all information for all installed packages. The database keeps track of all files that are changed and created when a user installs a program and can therefore very easily remove the same files. If the database gets corrupted (which happens easily if the RPM client is Kill ed), the double links ensure that it can often be rebuilt without any trouble. On Red Hat systems the database is stored in /var/lib/rpm.


PACKAGE LABEL


Every RPM package has a ''package label'', which contains the following pieces of information:
  • the software name

  • the software version (the version taken from original "upstream" source of the software)

  • the package release (the number of times the package has been rebuilt using the same version of the software) this field is also often used for indicating the specific distribution the package is intended for by appending strings like "mdk" ( Mandriva Linux ), "fc4" ( Fedora Core 4), "rhl9" (Red Hat Linux 9), "suse100" ( SUSE Linux 10.0) etc.

  • the architecture the package was built under (i386, i686, athlon, ppc, etc.)


and the RPM file would normally have the following format:

--..rpm

An example:

nano-0.98-2.i386.rpm

However, note that package label is contained within the file and does not necessarily need to match the name of the file. Source code may also be distributed in RPM packages. Such package labels do not have an architecture part and replace it with "src". E.g.:

libgnomeuimm2.0-2.0.0-3.src.rpm

Additionally, libraries are distributed in two separate packages for each version. One containing the precompiled code and one containing the development files such as header files etc. for the library in question. Those packages have "-devel" appended to their name field. Users need to carefully check so that the version of the development package matches that of the binary package, otherwise the library may very well not work.

RPM files with the noarch.rpm extension refer to files which do not depend on a certain computer's architecture. These files usually include graphics and text for another program to use.


ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE FORMAT


Advantages of using RPM packages over other ways to acquire and install software often cited are:
  • A uniform way for the user to install programs.

  • Simple to uninstall programs.

  • Popularity: lot of packages available, even though they often need recompilation to work in another distribution.

  • Non-interactive installation: makes it easy to automate installation.

  • Original source archive (e.g. .tar.gz, .tar.bz2) included: easy to verify.

  • Cryptographic verification with GPG and Md5 .

  • DeltaRPM s, which are RPM's equivalent of a Patch file, combine themselves with installed RPMs to perform updates on software that was installed by RPM. This is a much more convenient way to update RPM-installed software, since DeltaRPM doesn't require the original package to perform the update.


Disadvantages often cited include:
  • Often has backwards incompatible changes in package format.

  • Incomplete and outdated documentation.

  • Packaging typically has a shallow learning curve.

  • Sometimes contradictory package version dependencies, varying by which Linux distribution is using RPM.

  • Cannot be unpacked with ordinary tools like deb and tgz packages (though the rpm source tarball includes a shell script - rpm2cpio.sh {Link without Title} - that extracts the cpio archive part from an rpm using only od, expr, dd and gunzip).


RPM has also been criticized for a lack of consistency in package names and content, which can make automatic dependency handling difficult. However, this is not a problem inherent in the RPM ''format'', but rather a problem of co-ordination amongst major or Apt (see below). A tool exclusively for Mandriva Linux is Urpmi , and can help with the so called ' Dependency Hell '.


CREATING RPMS


The "recipe" for creating an RPM package is a spec file. Spec files end in the ".spec" extension and contain the package name, version, RPM revision number, steps to build, install, and clean a package, and a changelog. Multiple packages can be built from a single RPM spec file, if desired. RPM packages are created from RPM spec files using the rpmbuild tool.


SUPPORTED LINUX DISTRIBUTIONS


Several Linux distributions support RPM. These include, but are not limited to:




RELATED TOOLS

There are several front ends to RPM that resolve dependencies.

The best-known ones are:
  • YaST used in SuSE

  • Urpmi used in Mandriva Linux

  • Yum used in Yellow Dog Linux and Fedora Core.

  • Apt4rpm , a port of Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool (APT) whose use is recommended by some Fedora repositories. It is less actively developed but generally uses fewer CPU cycles than the above.


See Also: archive formats
package management system




EXTERNAL REFERENCES AND LINKS