Outcome-based Education Website Links For
Education
 

Information About

Outcome-based Education





OBE is good

Its proponents view OBE as a liberating and rightful replacement for the ills of traditional
education based on mastering and memorizing content, ranking by ability,
getting credit for mere seat time, and serving as an umbrella for a wide
variety of education reforms, from constructivist math to whole language. Liberal
politicians often support OBE because of its vision of high standards for all
groups and the promise that all students will be in the 80th percentile.
Conservatives like the idea of measuring outputs rather than input money spent,
and insisting that student demonstrate learning rather than just showing up.
Large corporations such as Boeing, IBM and Nintendo often participate in the process, and pay for expensive
public relations campaigns because they want a capable workforce.


OBE is bad

Its detractors view it as a disaster of biblical proportions. The first to
complain are often conservative Christians who dislike the liberal worldview promoted with OBE,
but also gaining the opposition of liberal educators who dislike measuring the value
of children with a single test score, and denying basic rights of a high
school diploma with the same, especially since gaps between races actually tend
to be wider than the previous system where there were no official consequences attached to
low test scores.


OBE Process in USA

In the United States, OBE is currently best known as the movement for
"high standards" " No Child Left Behind ", and a series of state assessments such
as WASL and MCAS where high school graduation will require achieving a
passing score on a test which initially fails 60-70 percent of the population. Although there have been a few notable spectacular failures, such as in Littleton, Colorado ,
and California's abrupt cancellation of CLAS , there
is little or no formal funded opposition. Millions are spent by non-profits
to promote and enlist the support of coporations and foundations to promote the
practice. Washington's Partnership For Learning is a typical institution which was created to support the education reform law, and give the impression of, and create public support against possible opposition from citizens.

In most US states, the OBE process was designed by the blueprint
"America's Choice: High Skills or Low Wages" of the NCEE which is headed by Marc Tucker . OBE is said to be patterned after many of the idea of TQM . If a school is like a factory, then producing high quality students should be like quality control. If outcomes are specified and measured, then processes of continual improvement should make it as easy to produce defect-free students as chocolate chip cookies. All we have do do is start with a test with a high failure rate, and then gradually increase pass rate. A state would produce
outcomes, or "standards" to be covered at grades 4, 7, and 10, and an Performance Based Assessment aligned to the curriculum standards would be produced.


Certificate Of Initial Mastery (CIM)

A student who passed the 10th
grade test would get a Certificate Of Initial Mastery . Some critics argue that the assessment does not measure knowledge as their parents would understand it, but instead measure the degree that controversial new teaching methods and values have been implemented.
She would then be allowed to continue 2 more years of career based training. A national standards board would be created which would create similar tests for all 8 career fields which would bar the employment of those who were not offically trained or certificated.
The CIM has been abandoned by almost every state, but in its place, states effectively replaced the diploma with CIM by requiring passing the same 10th grade test. The CIM concept was patterned after nations like Germany where most students end their formal education after grade 10, and this is why states require a 10 grade test to exit grade 12. These tests were deliberately calibrated to fail as many as 70 percent of students in the first year of testing. California's CLAS was later revealed to not have allowed ANY high scores the first year in math, and it was common for states to tell their graders to give very low grades the first year. But they always rise at a rate of 5 or more points per year as teachers include test problems in their lessons, the difficulty level of the test, and passing scores are adjusted, even though standardized tests and the NAEP typically show little or no improvement. Massachusetts is given as an example of the success of OBE because of a high test passing rate. However, critics say that this because many students have been forced out by "standards", and the failure rate of minority groups continues to be several times the majority rate.


Levels

This education replaces grades such as "A" "B" "C", or percentages.
Instead of grades the student is "levelled". From kindergarten to
year 12, the student will receive either a Foundational level (which
is pre-institutional) or be evidenced at levels 1 through to 8. A
student cannot 'fail', he or she will just simply not achieve in the
level many of her or his students are achieving. This acknowledges
differential growth at different stages, and focuses the teacher on
the needs of the students

Many people are against OBE, perhaps suggesting that it doesn't let
students excel because they are levelled. However, the system allows
for a student to achieve at higher levels beyond the average of the
grade or year. Some of the resistance no doubt comes from the
considerable extra work for teachers to evidence outcomes for each
student, and parents simply do not have past experience to help them
appreciate the method. Many students do not understand the marks they
receive either, and due to the set out of OBE, a well written essay
that wasn't planned meticulously may rate low for its lack of
processes and strategies. A student who achieves a level 4 in one
outcome and two level 5s in two other outcomes will achieve a level
4.8, the same as a student who achieved two level 8s and a level 4,
with the 3 level gap between 5 and 8 not being recognised.
Familiarity could ease concerns, but the enormous claim on teachers'
time to both initially learn, administer and develop curriculum for
the method naturally has its critics.


Anti OBE

PLATO, People Lobbying Against Teaching Outcomes, is a self-named
group of people against OBE, created by Greg Williams. This group of people disagree with the
Western Australian Minister for Education, and her commitment to OBE.
The group includes many outraged teachers from Western Australia.

William Spady promoted the OBE method as a way of getting beyond
meaningless percentages and marks, aiming for education for life
beyond school, giving children and young adults a broader and more
transformative education. Unfortunately inelegant implementation
makes the future of OBE unclear, and at odds with the Australian
Government in Canberra.


Signs of OBE

OBE was heavily promoted in the US in the 1980s.
If your school has
adopted report cards that say whether you child "met the standard" instead of A-F, it
is using OBE. If your state is reporting how many children "met the
standards", and requires passing to graduate, it is using OBE. If your new test costs $50 to score, and 6 months to get the results back, and
they promise that everyone in all subgroups will pass in 5 years when 50% are failing this year, it is OBE. If your state has allocated millions of
dollars to develop new standards and a new test, and big businesses are donating millions in publicity to promoted "education reform", and teachers and parents must spend
overtime in massive retraining and re-education, it is OBE. If you hear that "all
can suceed", they will meet "world class standards" with "new skills for the 21st centuty" and that they are "raising the bar", and that your
child will get a "diploma that is meaningful", it is OBE. If your
students are spending all of their time on complex projects with low academic content only to get
low grades, it is probably OBE. If your principal says "we are not doing OBE", they are doing OBE.


OBE As Demanded By Business and Citizens

It often ran into heavy opposition from parents. Often, when
legislators and officials have been persuaded or forced to
abandon it, it resurfaces with a new name such as Performance Based Education , and most recently Standards Based Education . OBE
is universally said to be the result of demands from parents and
business that diplomas don't guarantee learning, and that education
reform is driven by parents who seemingly are demanding lower grades
and stripping the diploma from any of their children who don't have
the skills neccesary to get into the best universities.


OBE as Snake Oil

The other view
is that OBE was really driven by the education reform industry, such
as the NCEE , which would visit districts and legislators, and use
processes such as Delphi on isolated business, parent and education
leaders to get their help in implementing OBE instead of considering
whether OBE was a good idea in the first place. The NCEE was
known to have worked with states and districts which covered as many as
half of the public school students in the nation, including Washington,
Vermont, and Texas, and to have essentially written the initial legislation
which created and authorized spending for OBE testing and standards, and the Certificate Of Mastery which would be awarded upon passing a test which demonstrated achieving the learning "outcomes". Very
few citizens outside the small education reform opposition movement know of the central role played by the NCEE in the mass adoption of tying graduation to passing standards-based assessments such as WASL .


All Will Succeed = All Will Work Really Hard

Instead of a paradise where
every one succeeded regardless of ability, the bar of
"what every child must know and be able to do" is often been raised so
that even high performing students get low grades. At Skyline High School in Issaquah ,
Washington, there were TV news stories of how their campuses felt like
academic labor camps, and parents questioned why their high school students were asked to do college level work. The problem with the mantra "all will
succeed" tends to be implemented as "all students must perform as well
as the successful top 10 or 20 percent". Passing standard changes from
a D grade to tasks far more complex than simply getting a 90% pass
rate on a multiple choice test of facts that were taught, which was
once the requirement for an A grade.


Massive Failure in Littleton Colorado

"Government Nannies: The cradle-to-grave agenda of Goals 2000 & Outcome Based Education" by Cathy Duffy (1995) notes losses of students and staff due to outcome-based education.
There were 36 demonstrations required for graduation, but
"high-school classes and grades carried no weight. Only 145 of 533 students enrolled completed algebra. Demonstrating knowledge of algebra was not a
graduation requirement. So far, no OBE demonstration in a diverse
high school has ever produced a 100 percent graduation rate will every student
of every ethnic, economic, and special education status being qualified for
every job and every college, but this is usually due to ineffective implementation
rather than any inherent problems with the vision of OBE.

In "Assessment of Student Performance: Studies of Education Reform" by the
U.S. Department of Education, it is noted that "Littleton, Colorado, had to rescind its reforms due to community opposition. The community was not kept well informed, and the reforms were enacted too swiftly. In the end, community members felt that vague, nonacademic outcomes were replacing content, and that technically unsound assessments would be used to determine something as important as high school graduation"


Projects


Instead of simplistic reading, drill, and testing of facts, very large
projects involving music, arts, crafts, or even electronics which take
the entirety of spring break to construct, say 3 models of 20s-30s
cars, 6 pictures, 6 write-ups on each car, plus an oral presentation
for 20th century history, or producing and performing a play or video.

The NCEE New Standards program for example in its literature
proposes that 2 4th graders with the assistance of a professional
carpenter produce and build a bike trailer, complete with 3-view and
oblique projection, and parts list including cotter pins and
counter-sink drill head. The corresponding high school example
project was to use an electric motor donated by the power company to
engineer and build an electric car. This sort of project might take
Toyota a team of 12 engineers 2 years with a budget of 10 million
dollars. It would certainly desirable if all students could
demonstrate such performance, but it is unreasonable to expect all
students to pass such a level.


Outcomes

OBE typically replaces the expectation of teaching and retention of
basic skills and facts with what some would call "fuzzy" non-academic
"outcomes" such as "will think critically", "become a life-long
learner", "preserve the environment", "value diversity" which don't
change much from grade to grade. The inegalitarian notion that people
must be graded and ranked on a curve with artificially creates winners
and losers, and that only some students will be expected to go to college
is replaced by standards sufficient that all can attain the ability to
meet the one standard which is adequate for any job and any college.

Right and wrong answers are replaced with "rubrics", where
correct answers and passing levels on tests are often determined after
answers are turned in. Standardized Tests which are machine scored
and ranked are replaced with Standards Based Assessment , which are
scored by low paid temporary staff against a handful of anchor papers,
and all students are scored against an arbitrary passing score, which
in most states is required for graduation for students, regardless of
ability, and typically corresponds to a performance level neccesary
for entrance to a competitive 4 year university.


OBE As Umbrella for Education Reform

OBE also typically promotes Constructivism , Inquiry Based Science and [[reform
mathematics]], which believes that carry and average are too complex
and demeaning for K-6, but college geometry and statistics is
neccesary for the 21st century. School To Work is also usually a
component, which replaces the Comprehensive High School concept of
career and academic tracks into requiring all students to spend school
time in a work experience, much like the German concept, except that
students on a univerisity track are exempt from working for a company.


Pro OBE Links