Oral Law Article Index for
Oral
Website Links For
Oral
 

Information About

Oral Law




Many cultures do have an oral law, while most contemporary legal systems have a formal written organisation. The oral tradition (from the Latin ''tradere'' = to transmit) is the typical instrument of transmission of the oral codes or, in a more general sense, is the complex of what a culture transmits of itself among the generations, "from father to son". This kind of transmission can be due to lack of other means (like for illiterate or criminal societies) or can be expressedly required by the same law.


ORAL LAW IN JURISPRUDENCE

From a legal point of view, an oral law can be:
  • a Habit , or Custom with legal relevance or when the formal law expressly refers to it (but in this latter case, it is properly an indirect source of legal Right s and Obligation s);

  • a spoken command or order that has to be respected as a Law (in most modern western legal systems, some dispositions can be issued by word in given cases of emergency).

  • An oral law, intended as a body of rules, can be admitted in Jurisprudence as long as it shows some efficacy, therefore it needs that the law is public, the human action is evaluated by a Judge (ordinarily producing a Sentence according to the general interpretation of the law) and then a Punishment has eventually to be put into effect. Some oral laws provide all these elements (for instance, some codes of conduct in use among criminal associations like Mafia do have a well known law, a judge, a condemnation), while others usually miss some of them.



ORAL LAW IN JUDAISM

See Also: Oral Torah



Rabbinic Judaism holds that the books of the Tanakh (The Old Testament ) were transmitted in parallel with an oral tradition, as relayed by the scholarly and other religious leaders of each generation. The "written law" (''Torah she-bi-khtav'' תורה שבכתב) comprises the Torah and the rest of the Tanakh ; the "Oral Law" (''Torah she-be'al peh'' תורה שבעל פה) was ultimately recorded in the Talmud and Midrash . The interpretation of the Oral Law is thus considered as the authoritative reading of the Written Law . Further, Jewish Law is based on a "Written Law" together with an "Oral Law". Jewish Law And Tradition thus is not based on a literal reading of the Tanakh, but on the combined oral and written tradition.


SEE ALSO



General

  • Bibliography

  • ---J. Vansina (tr. Wright), "Oral Tradition" (London, 1965); id., "Oral Tradition as History" (Wisconsin, 1985)

  • ---R. Finnegan, "Oral Poetry" (Cambridge, 1977)

  • ---D.P. Henige "The Chronology of Oral Tradition" (Oxford, 1974); id., "Oral Historiography" (London, 1982)

  • ---J. Goody & I. Watt, in J. Goody (ed.), "Literacy in Traditional Societies" (Cambridge, 1968), 27-68

  • ---E. Tonkin, "Narrating our Pasts" (Cambridge, 1992).

  • ---The survey essay by Finnegan in "History and Theory" 10 (1970), 195-201.