| Opendocument |
Article Index for Opendocument |
Articles about Opendocument |
Information AboutOpendocument |
|
The standard was publicly developed by a variety of organizations, is publicly accessible, and can be implemented by anyone without restriction. The OpenDocument format is intended to provide an open alternative to Proprietary document formats including the popular but undocumented DOC , XLS , and PPT formats used by Microsoft Office , as well as Microsoft Office Open XML format (this latter format has various licensing requirements that prevent some competitors from using it). Organizations and individuals that store their data in an open format such as OpenDocument avoid being Locked In to a single software vendor, leaving them free to switch software if their current vendor goes out of business, raises its prices, changes its software, or changes its Licensing terms to something less favorable. OpenDocument is the only standard for editable office documents that has been vetted by an independent recognized standards body, has been implemented by multiple vendors, and can be implemented by any supplier (including proprietary software vendors as well as developers using open source software licenses such as the GNU LGPL or GNU GPL ). PUBLIC POLICY IMPLICATIONS Since one objective of open formats like OpenDocument is to guarantee long-term access to data without legal or technical barriers, governments have become increasingly aware of open formats as a public policy issue. For example, in 2002 , Dr. Edgar David Villanueva Nuñes , a Lawyer and Congressman of the Republic of Perú , wrote a letter to Microsoft Peru raising questions about free and permanent document access with proprietary formats. European countries and the US State of Massachusetts in particular have been examining the ramifications of selecting a document format. Europe See Also: Adoption of ODF in Europe European governments have, since at least 2003, been investigating various options for storing documents in an XML-based format, commissioning technical studies such as the "Valoris Report" (Valoris). In March 2004, European governments asked an OpenOffice team and a Microsoft team to present on the relative merits of their XML-based office document formats (Bray, September 29 2004 ). Massachusetts See Also: Adoption of ODF in Massachusetts Massachusetts has also been examining its options for implementing XML-based document processing. In early 2005 , Eric Kriss , Secretary of Administration and Finance in Massachusetts , was the first government official in the United States to publicly connect open formats to a public policy purpose: "It is an overriding imperative of the American democratic system that we cannot have our public documents locked up in some kind of proprietary format, perhaps unreadable in the future, or subject to a proprietary system license that restricts access." {Link without Title} Other governments According to OASIS' OpenDocument datasheet, "Singapore's Ministry of Defence, France's Ministry of Finance and its Ministry of Economy, Finance, and Industry, Brazil's Ministry of Health, the City of Munich, Germany, UK's Bristol City Council, and the City of Vienna in Austria are all adopting applications that support OpenDocument." (OASIS, 2005b). In November, 2005, James Gallt, associate director for the National Association of State Chief Information Officers, said that a number of other state agencies are also exploring the use of OpenDocument (LaMonica, November 10, 2005). BECTA (British Education Communication Technology Agency) is the UK agency in charge of defining information technology (IT) policy for all schools in the United Kingdom, including standards for all the schools' infrastructure. In 2005 they published a comprehensive document describing the policy for infrastructure in schools. This document requires the use of OpenDocument or a few other formats for office document data, and in particular it does ''not'' allow the use of Microsoft's binary (.doc/.xls/.ppt) or XML formats. BECTA explains this as follows: "Any office application used by institutions must be able to be saved to (and so viewed by others) using a commonly agreed format that ensures an institution is not locked into using specific software. The main aim is for all office based applications to provide functionality to meet the specifications described here (whether licensed software, open source or unlicensed freeware) and thus many application providers could supply the educational institution ICT market." (Lynch, 2005). In April, 2006, a bill was introduced in the Minnesota state legislature to require all state agencies to use open data formats. It is expected that the OpenDocument Format will be advanced as a way of meeting the proposed requirement. (Gardner, April 7, 2006). STANDARDIZATION See Also: Standardization of OpenDocument The OpenDocument standard was developed by the OASIS industry consortium. The standardization process included the developers of many office suites or related document systems, including (in alphabetical order):
APPLICATION SUPPORT A number of applications and programs support OpenDocument. Microsoft refuses for the moment to support the OpenDocument format, claiming that it lacks independent implementations and important functionality, although it has hinted that it may change its position in the future. Lastly claimed position of Microsoft was that they will support the OpenDocument format in MS Office if there is customer demand. {Link without Title} for supporting ODF in MS Office . SPECIFICATIONS See Also: OpenDocument technical specifications The most common file extensions used for OpenDocument documents are .odt for text documents, .ods for spreadsheets, .odp for presentations, .odg for graphics, and .odb for databases. An OpenDocument file can be either a simple XML file which uses '' ACCESSIBILITY See Also: Accessibility in OpenDocument One important issue raised in the discussion of OpenDocument is whether or not the format is Accessible to those with Disabilities . There are two issues: does the specification support accessibility, and are implementations accessible? While the Specification of OpenDocument is going through an extensive accessibility review, it is known that many of the components it is built on (such as SMIL for audio and multimedia and SVG for vector graphics) have already gone through the W3C 's Web Accessibility Initiative processes. There are already applications that currently read/write OpenDocument that export Tagged PDF files (in support of PDF accessibility); this suggests that much or all of the necessary data for accessibility is already included in the OpenDocument format. In contrast, Microsoft Office 's proprietary file formats have had no public peer review of accessibility issues, and in fact the widely-used binary formats are not even published for review, so the OpenDocument specification is being held to a higher standard than either set of Microsoft formats. Many argue that open formats like OpenDocument are necessary for true accessibility. Proprietary formats cannot be Implemented by all parties, and thus create unnecessary barriers in creating accessibility technologies. In contrast, OpenDocument is fully specified in a public document without any implementation barriers, allowing anyone to create the software necessary for those with disabilities. However, having an accessible specification is not enough; what is also needed are accessible implementations, which is not and should not be a concern about the format. TECHNICAL COMPARISON WITH MICROSOFT XML FORMATS See Also: Comparison of OpenDocument with Microsoft XML formats LICENSING See Also: OpenDocument vs. Microsoft Office Open XML licensing The OpenDocument specification is available for free download and use . An irrevocable intellectual property covenant made by key contributor . In short, anyone can implement OpenDocument, without restraint, and as shown in List Of Applications Supporting OpenDocument both proprietary and open source software programs implement the format. PROMOTION OASIS promotes the OpenDocument Format (since it is their work). The OpenOffice.org Project promotes the OpenDocument Format, as it is used as the default file format in the Open Source office suite. Several groups and companies support the OpenDocument Format. For example:
SEE ALSO
REFERENCES |
|
|