Norberg V. Wynrib Website Links For
Norberg
 

Information About

Norberg V. Wynrib




Laura Norberg was going to Dr. Wynrib for treatment of a drug addiction. However, her doctor demanded sexual favours in exchange for more drugs. She brought an action against his for sexual assault.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed the case on the basis that she consented.

In a unanimous decision, the Court found in favour of Norberg.

Justice McLachlin characterized the duty.
The relationship of physician and patient can be conceptualized in a variety of ways. It can be viewed as a creature of contract, with the physician's failure to fulfil his or her obligations giving rise to an action for breach of contract. It undoubtedly gives rise to a duty of care, the breach of which constitutes the tort of negligence. In common with all members of society, the doctor owes the patient a duty not to touch him or her without his or her consent; if the doctor breaches this duty, he or she will have committed the tort of battery. But perhaps the most fundamental characteristic of the doctor-patient relationship is its fiduciary nature. All the authorities agree that the relationship of physician to patient also falls into that special category of relationships which the law calls fiduciary.



SEE ALSO



NOTES



EXTERNAL LINK