National Institute On Drug Abuse Article Index for
National Institute
Website Links For
National Institute
 

Information About

National Institute On Drug Abuse




The National Institute on Drug Abuse is a United States agency whose mission is to "lead the Nation in bringing the power of science to bear on drug abuse and addiction" {Link without Title} .

In under the United States Department Of Health And Human Services .


CONTROVERSIAL RESEARCH

DAWN is a program to collect statistics on the frequency of Emergency Room mentions of use of different types of drugs. This information is widely cited by drug policy officials, who have sometimes confused Drug-Related Episodes - emergency room visits induced by drugs - with Drug Mentions. The Wisconsin Department of Justice claimed, "In Wisconsin, Marijuana overdose visits in emergency rooms equal to Heroin or Morphine , twice as common as Valium." Common Sense for Drug Policy called this as a distortion, noting, "The federal DAWN report itself notes that reports of marijuana do not mean people are going to the hospital for a marijuana Overdose , it only means that people going to the hospital for a drug overdose mention marijuana as a drug they use" {Link without Title} .

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health is an annual study of American drug use patterns. According to NIDA, "The data collection method is in–person interviews conducted with a sample of individuals at their place of residence. ACASI provides a highly private and confidential means of responding to questions to increase the level of honest reporting of illicit drug use and other sensitive behavior." Sixty-eight thousand people were interviewed in 2003, with a weighted response rate for interviewing of seventy three percent [http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k3/NSDUH/nsduh.htm]. Like DAWN, the Survey often results in controversy because of how the data is used by drug policy officials. Rob Kampia of Marijuana Policy Project stated in a September 5 , 2002 press release, "The government reaches that exact same conclusion regardless of whether drug use is going up, down, or staying the same. If use is going up they say, `We're in a drug abuse emergency; we need to crack down harder.' If use is going down, they say, `Our strategy is working; we need to crack down harder.' A cynic might think they had made up their minds before even looking at the data" [http://www.mpp.org/releases/nr090502.html].

NIDA literature and with the reward system is not fully understood {Link without Title} .


UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI CANNABIS SUPPLY

NIDA administers a contract with the researchers typically prefer to use high-potency marijuana, but NIDA's National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse has been reluctant to provide cannabis with high THC levels, citing safety concerns {Link without Title} :

Most clinical studies have been conducted using cannabis cigarettes with a potency of 2-4% THC. However, it is anticipated that there will be requests for cannabis cigarettes with a higher potency or with other mixes of cannabinoids. For example, NIDA has received a request for cigarettes with an eight % potency. The subcommittee notes that very little is known about the clinical pharmacology of this higher potency. Thus, while NIDA research has provided a large body of literature related to the clinical pharmacology of -cannabis, research is still needed to establish the safety of new dosage forms and new formulations.


Speaking before the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse, Rob Kampia of the Marijuana Policy Project criticized NIDA for refusing to provide researcher Donald Abrams with marijuana for his studies, stating that "after nine months of delay, Dr. Leshner rejected Dr. Abrams' request for marijuana, on what we believe are political grounds that the FDA-approved protocol is inadequate" {Link without Title} .


REFERENCES