| Liberals |
Article Index for Liberals |
Shopping Liberalism |
Articles about Liberalism |
Website Links For Liberalism |
Information AboutLiberals |
|
:''This article discusses liberalism as a major political Ideology as it developed and stands currently. For other uses, see Liberal (disambiguation) . Liberalism is an assumptions which dominated most earlier theories of government, such as the Divine Right Of Kings , hereditary status, and established Religion . Fundamental human rights that all liberals support include the right to life, liberty, and property. In many countries, modern liberalism differs from classical liberalism by asserting that government provision of some minimal level of material well-being takes priority over freedom from taxation. Liberalism has it roots in the Western Enlightenment, but the term now encompasses a diversity of political thought, with adherents spanning a large part of the political spectrum, from left to right. In the context of Economics , the term "liberalism" refers to Economic Liberalism . THE NATURE AND ORIGINS OF LIBERALISM Etymology and historical usage The word "liberal" derives from the Latin ''liber'' ("free"), from which the term "liberty" also comes. Livy 's ''History of Rome from Its Foundation'' describes the struggles for freedom between the Plebeian and Patrician classes. Marcus Aurelius in his ''Meditations'' writes about "...the idea of a polity administered with regard to equal rights and equal freedom of speech, and the idea of a kingly government which respects most of all the freedom of the governed... ." Largely dormant during the vicissitudes of the Middle Age s, the struggle for freedom began again in the Italian Renaissance , in the conflict between the supporters of free city states and the supporters of the Pope . Niccolò Machiavelli , in his ''Discourses on Livy'', laid down the principles of Republic an government. John Locke in England and the thinkers of the French Enlightenment articulated the struggle for freedom in terms of the Rights Of Man . The '' Oxford English Dictionary '' (''OED'') indicates that the word ''liberal'' has long been in the English language with the meanings of "befitting free men, noble, generous" as in '' Liberal Arts ''; also with the meaning "free from restraint in speech or action", as in ''liberal with the purse'', or ''liberal tongue'', usually as a term of reproach but, beginning 1776–88 imbued with a more favorable sense by Edward Gibbon and others to mean "free from prejudice, tolerant." The first English language use to mean "tending in favor of freedom and ) ''Sketches of the State of Manners and Opinions in the French Republic'', 1801. Cited in the '' Oxford English Dictionary ''. The American War Of Independence established the first nation to craft a constitution based on the concept of liberal government, especially the idea that governments rule by the consent of the governed. The more moderate '' Bourgeois '' elements of the French Revolution tried to establish a government based on liberal principles. Economist s such as Adam Smith , in '' The Wealth Of Nations '' ( 1776 ), enunciated the liberal principles of free trade. The editors of the Spanish Constitution Of 1812 , drafted in Cádiz , may have been the first to use the word ''liberal'' in a political sense as a noun. They named themselves the ''Liberales'', to express their opposition to the Absolutist power of the Spanish Monarchy . Beginning in the late 18th century, liberalism became a major ideology in virtually all developed countries. Trends within liberalism Within the above framework, there are deep, often bitter, conflicts and controversies among liberals. Emerging from those controversies, out of Classical Liberalism , are a number of different trends within liberalism. As in many debates, opposite sides use different words for the same beliefs, and sometimes use identical words for different beliefs. For the purposes of this article, we will use "political liberalism" for the support of (liberal) democracy (either in a republic or a Constitutional Monarchy ), over Absolute Monarchy or dictatorship; "cultural liberalism" for the support of individual liberty over laws limiting liberty for patriotic or religious reasons; "economic liberalism" for the support of private property, over government regulation; and "social liberalism" for the support of equality, over inequalities of opportunity. By "modern liberalism" we mean the mixture of these forms of liberalism found in most First World countries today, rather than any one of the pure forms listed above. Some principles liberals generally agree upon:
However, some trends within liberalism reveal stark differences of opinion:
The struggle between economic freedom and social equality is almost as old as the idea of freedom itself. Plutarch , writing about Solon (c. 639 - c. 559 BC), the lawgiver of ancient Athens, wrote "The remission of debts was peculiar to Solon; it was his great means for confirming the citizens' liberty; for a mere law to give all men equal rights is but useless, if the poor must sacrifice those rights to their debts, and, in the very seats and sanctuaries of equality, the courts of justice, the offices of state, and the public discussions, be more than anywhere at the beck and bidding of the rich." Economic liberals see positive rights as necessarily violating negative rights, and therefore illegitimate. They see a limited role for government. Some economic liberals see no proper function of government, while others would limit government to courts, police, and defense against foreign invasion (minarchists.) Social liberals, in contrast, see a major role for government in promoting the general welfare - providing some or all of the following services: food and shelter for those who cannot provide for themselves, medical care, schools, retirement, care for children and for the disabled, including those disabled by old age, help for victims of natural disaster, protection of minorities, prevention of crime, and support for the arts and sciences. This largely abandons the idea of limited government. Both forms of liberalism seek the same end - liberty - but they disagree strongly about the best or most moral means to attain it. Some liberal parties emphasize economic liberalism, while others focus on social liberalism. Conservative parties often favor economic liberalism while opposing social and cultural liberalism. In all of the forms of liberalism listed above there is a general belief that there should be a balance between government and private responsibilities, and that government should be limited to those tasks which cannot be carried out best by the private sector. All forms of liberalism claim to protect the fundamental dignity and autonomy of the individual under Law , all claim that freedom of individual action promotes the best society. Liberalism is so widespread in the modern world that most western nations at least pay lip service to individual liberty as the basis for society. Comparative influences Early Enlightenment thinkers contrasted liberalism with the authoritarianism of the Ancien Regime , Feudalism Mercantilism and the Roman Catholic Church . Later, as more radical philosophers articulated their thoughts in the course of the French Revolution and throughout the nineteenth century, liberalism defined itself in contrast to Socialism and Communism , although modern European liberal parties have often formed coalitions with Social-democratic parties. In the 20th Century liberalism defined itself in opposition to Totalitarianism and Collectivism . Some modern liberals have rejected the classical Just War Theory , which emphasizes neutrality and free trade, in favor of multilateral Interventionism and Collective Security . Liberalism favors limited state power. Extreme anti-statist liberalism, as advocated by often rejects liberal thought in its entirety. DEVELOPMENT OF LIBERAL THOUGHT A more comprehensive overview of the development of liberal thought can be found in History Of Liberal Thought and Contributions To Liberal Theory . The focus on "liberty" as an essential right of people within the polity has been repeatedly asserted throughout history. As an ideology, liberalism can trace its roots back to the , which he saw as "life, liberty and property". On the European continent, the doctrine of laws restraining even monarchs was expounded by Charles De Secondat, Baron De Montesquieu , whose '' The Spirit Of The Laws '' argues that "Better is it to say, that the government most conformable to nature is that which best agrees with the humour and disposition of the people in whose favour it is established," rather than accept as natural the mere rule of force. A main contributing group of thinkers whose work would become considered part of liberalism are those associated with the " Scottish Enlightenment ", including the writers David Hume and Adam Smith , and the German Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant . These thinkers, however, worked within the political framework of monarchies and in societies in which the class system and an established church were the norm. Although the earlier Wars Of The Three Kingdoms had resulted in the republican Commonwealth Of England between 1649 and 1660, the idea that ordinary human beings could structure their own affairs remained theoretical until the American and French Revolutions. (The Glorious Revolution of 1688 is often cited as a precedent, but it replaced one monarch with another monarch. It had, however, weakened the power of the monarch and strengthened the British Parliament which had refused to accept the Jacobite succession.) The republican ideas of Radicals influenced these two late 18th Century revolutions which became the examples which later Revolutionary liberals followed. Both used as their philosophical justification the Rights Of Man or the rights given, in the words of Henry St. John , by "Nature and Nature's God". They rejected both tradition and established power. The transition to liberal society in Europe sometimes came through Revolutionary or Secessionist violence, and there were repeated explicitly liberal revolutions and revolts throughout Europe in the first half of the 19th century. However, in Britain and many other nations, the process was driven more by politics than revolution, even if the process was not entirely tranquil. With the coming of Romanticism , liberal notions moved from being proposals for reform of existing governments, to demands for change. The American Revolution and the French Revolution would add " Democracy " to the list of values which liberal thought promoted. The idea, that the people were sovereign, and capable of making all necessary laws and enforcing them, went beyond the conceptions of the Enlightenment. European liberals, particularly after the French Constitution of 1793, thought that democracy, considered as majority rule by propertyless men, would be a danger to private property, and favored a franchise limited to those with a certain amount of property. Later liberal democrats, like de Tocqueville, disagreed. In the 19th century, the voting franchise in most liberal democracies was extended, and these newly enfranchised citizens often voted in favor of government solutions to the problems they faced in their everyday lives. A rapid increase in literacy and the spread of knowledge led to social activism in a variety of forms. It led to a split inside liberalism. Social liberals demanded laws against child labor and laws requiring minimum standards of worker safety and a minimum wage. The Laissez Faire economic liberals countered that such laws were an unjust imposition on life, liberty, and property, not to mention a hindrance to economic development. Thus began the struggle. On the one hand, economic liberals, who stress economic freedom and desire small governments. On the other hand, social liberals, who stress equality of opportunity, and desire a government large enough to protect citizens from the consequences of economic or natural difficulties that they consider too serious to be overcome without government aid. This 19th century social liberalism was the first significant split in liberalism. One of John Stuart Mill 's most important contributions to liberalism was his Utilitarian justification of liberalism. Mill grounded liberal ideas in the instrumental and pragmatic, allowing the unification of subjective ideas of liberty gained from the French thinkers in the tradition of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the more rights-based philosophies of John Locke in the British tradition. Ironically, while Mill might be historically the last classical liberal, his utilitarianism was a major factor in classical liberalism's popular decline. The utilitarian notion of ''the public good'' began to overshadow the rights of the individual. Mill wrote in favor of providing the material, educational, and moral conditions for freedom to bloom. The Great Depression of the 1930s shook public faith in "laissez-faire capitalism" and "the profit motive," leading many to conclude that the unregulated markets could not produce prosperity and prevent poverty. Many liberals were troubled by the political instability and restrictions on liberty that they believed were caused by the growing relative inequality of wealth. Key liberals of this persuasion, such as John Dewey , John Maynard Keynes , and Franklin D. Roosevelt , argued for the creation of a more elaborate state apparatus to serve as the bulwark of individual liberty, permitting the continuation of capitalism while protecting the citizens against its perceived excesses. Some liberals, including Hayek , whose work ''The Road to Serfdom'' remains influential, argued against these institutions, believing the Great Depression and Second World War to be individual events, that, once passed, did not justify a permanent change in the role of government. In the mid-20th century, liberalism began to define itself in opposition to Totalitarianism . It became a descriptive term for what liberalism considered the common characteristics of Fascist , Nazi and Marxist-Leninist regimes. Opposition to totalitarian regimes acquired great importance in liberal and democratic thinking, and they were often portrayed as trying to destroy liberal democracy. The rise of totalitarianism became a lens for liberal thought. Many liberals began to analyze their own beliefs and principles, and came to the conclusion that totalitarianism arose because people in a degraded condition turn to dictatorships for solutions. From this, it was argued that the state had the duty to protect the economic well being of its citizens. As Isaiah Berlin said, "Freedom for the wolves means death for the sheep." This growing body of liberal thought argued that reason requires a government to act as a balancing force in economics. Other liberal interpretations on the rise of totalitarianism were quite contrary to the growing body of thought on government regulation in supporting the market and capitalism. This included Friedrich Hayek 's work, '' The Road To Serfdom ''. Friedrich Von Hayek and Milton Friedman stated that economic freedom is a necessary condition for the creation and sustainability of civil and political freedoms. One of the most influential critics of totalitarianism was Karl Popper . In '' The Open Society And Its Enemies '' he defended Liberal Democracy and advocated Open Society . The post-war period saw the dominance of Modern Liberalism . Linking Modernism and progressivism to the notion that a populace in possession of rights and sufficient economic and educational means would be the best defense against totalitarian threats, the liberalism of this period took the stance that by enlightened use of liberal institutions, individual liberties could be maximized, and Self-actualization could be reached by the broad use of technology. Liberal writers in this period include economist John Kenneth Galbraith , philosopher John Rawls and sociologist Ralf Dahrendorf . A dissenting strain of thought developed that viewed any government involvement in the economy as a betrayal of liberal principles. Calling itself "libertarianism," this movement was centered around such schools of thought as Austrian Economics . After the 1970s, the ''liberal pendulum'' had swung away from increasing the role of government, and towards a greater use of the Free Market and Laissez-faire principles. In essence, many of the old pre-World War I ideas were making a comeback. THE IMPACT OF LIBERALISM IN THE MODERN WORLD The impact of liberalism on the modern world is profound. The ideas of individual liberties, personal dignity, free expression, religious tolerance, private property, universal human rights, transparency of government, limitations on government power, popular sovereignty, national self-determination, privacy, enlightened and rational policy, the rule of law, fundamental equality, a free market economy, and free trade were all radical notions some 250 years ago. Liberal Democracy , in its typical form of multiparty political pluralism, has spread to much of the world. Today all are accepted as the goals of policy in most nations, even if there is a wide gap between statements and reality. They are not only the goals of liberals, but also of Social Democrats , Conservatives , and Christian Democrats . There is, of course, opposition. ''See the Headlines Of Critique .'' POSITIONS OF CONTEMPORARY LIBERAL PARTIES AND MOVEMENTS A general overview of political positions Today the word "liberalism" is used differently in different countries. (''See Liberalism Worldwide .'') One of the greatest contrasts is between the usage in the United States and usage in Continental Europe . In the US, liberalism is usually contrasted with Conservatism , and American liberals support broader racial, ethnic, and religious Tolerance , and thus more readily embrace Multiculturalism and Affirmative Action . In Europe, on the other hand, liberalism is not only contrasted with conservatism and Christian Democracy , but also with Socialism and Social Democracy . In some countries, European liberals share common positions with Christian Democrats. Before an explanation of this subject proceeds, it is important to add this disclaimer: There is always a disconnect between philosophical ideals and political realities. Also, opponents of any belief are apt to describe that belief in different terms from those used by adherents. What follows is a record of those goals that overtly appear most consistently across major liberal manifestos (e.g., the Oxford Manifesto of 1947). It is not an attempt to catalogue the idiosyncratic views of particular persons, parties, or countries, nor is it an attempt to investigate any covert goals, since both are beyond the scope of this article. Most political parties which identify themselves as liberal claim to promote the rights and responsibilities of the individual, free choice within an open competitive process, the Free Market , and the dual responsibility of the state to protect the individual citizen and guarantee their liberty. Critics of liberal parties tend to state liberal policies in different terms. Economic freedom may lead to gross inequality. Free speech may lead to speech that is obscene, blasphemous, or treasonous. The role of the state as promoter of freedom and as protector of its citizens may come into conflict. Liberalism stresses the importance of representative ''). Liberalism advocates ''). The Rule Of Law and equality before the law are fundamental to liberalism. Government authority may only be legitimately exercised in accordance with laws that are adopted through an established procedure. Another aspect of the rule of law is an insistence upon the guarantee of an independent Judiciary , whose political independence is intended to act as a safeguard against arbitrary rulings in individual cases. The rule of law includes concepts such as the Presumption Of Innocence , no Double Jeopardy , and Habeas Corpus . Rule of law is seen by liberals as a guard against despotism and as enforcing limitations on the power of government. In the penal system, liberals in general reject punishments they see as inhumane, including Capital Punishment . Racism is incompatible with liberalism. Liberals in Europe are generally hostile to any attempts by the state to enforce equality in employment by legal action against employers, whereas in the United States many liberals favor such Affirmative Action . Liberals in general support equal opportunity, but not necessarily equal outcome. Most European liberal parties do not favour employment Quotas for women and ethnic minorities as the best way to end Gender and racial inequality. However, all agree that arbitrary discrimination on the basis of race or gender is morally wrong. Economic liberals today stress the importance of a free market and free trade, and seek to limit ''). Modern liberal movements often agree in principle with the idea of free trade, but maintain some skepticism, seeing unrestricted trade as leading to the growth of multi-national corporations and the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the few. In the post-war consensus on the Welfare State in Europe, liberals supported government responsibility for health, education, and alleviating poverty while still calling for a market based on independent exchange. Liberals agree that a high quality of health care and education should be available for all citizens, but differ in their views on the degree to which governments should supply these benefits. Since poverty is a threat to personal liberty, liberalism seeks a balance between individual responsibility and community responsibility. In particular, liberals favor special protection for the handicapped, the sick, the disabled, and the aged Oxford Manifesto , 1947. European liberalism turned back to more '' Laissez-faire '' policies in the 1980's and 1990's, and supported Privatisation and Liberalisation in health care and other public sectors. Modern European liberals generally tend to believe in a smaller role for government than would be supported by most Social Democrats , let alone Socialists or Communists . The European liberal consensus appears to involve a belief that economies should be decentralized. In general, contemporary European liberals do not believe that the government should directly control any industrial production through State Owned Enterprise s, which places them in opposition to Social Democrat s. Liberals generally believe in neutral government, in the sense that it is not for the state to determine personal values. As John Rawls put it, "The state has no right to determine a particular conception of ''the good life''". In the United States this neutrality is expressed in the Declaration Of Independence as the right to the pursuit of happiness. Both in Europe and in the United States, liberals often support the Pro-choice movement and advocate equal rights for women and homosexuals. Some liberal parties now oppose Multiculturalism , which they see damaging national unity. Others liberal parties embrace multiculturalism as enriching society, but object to cultures which deny rights to women or to other ethnic groups. And there are some liberals who argue for complete tolerance of all ethnic groups and oppose forcing any values, such as women's rights, on cultures that have different views. Many liberals share values with environmentalists, such as the ''). There is no consensus about liberal doctrine in international politics, though there are some central notions, which can be deduced from, for example, the opinions of can be abolished. Some favor internationalism, and support the United Nations . Economic liberals, on the other hand, favor non-interventionism rather than collective security. Liberals believe in the right of every individual to enjoy the essential human liberties, and support self-determination for national minorities. Essential also is the free exchange of ideas, news, goods and services between people, as well as freedom of travel within and between all countries. Liberals generally oppose Censorship , protective trade barriers, and exchange regulations. Some liberals were among the strongest advocates of international co-operation and the building of supra-national organizations, such as the European Union . In the view of social liberals, a global free and fair market can only work if companies worldwide respect a set of common minimal social and ecological standards. A controversial question, on which there is no liberal consensus, is Immigration . Do nations have a right to limit the flow of immigrants from countries with growing populations to countries with stable or declining populations? Political deviances Recently, however, "Liberal" parties in Europe have begun to rethink their positions, in response to the confrontation with radical forms of Islam , with political Islamism . They are confronted with a dilemma between respect for other cultures and individual rights. Liberalism traditionally holds that state and society should have very limited interests in the private behavior of its citizens in the areas of private sexual relations, free speech, personal conscience, religious beliefs, and political association. European "liberals" are less willing to extend freedom to people who require others the wearing of the Burqa and Arranged Marriage , which they see as contradictory to individual freedom (especially for women). Many European liberals now think that the state should actively promote 'western values', 'European values' and/or 'Enlightenment values'. Comparative critiques Statist opponents of liberalism reject its emphasis on individual rights, and instead emphasize the Collective or the Community to a degree where the rights of the individual are either diminished or abolished. This position is called Collectivism . Collectivism can be found both to the right and to the left of liberalism. On the left, the collective that tends to be enhanced is the state, often in the form of State Socialism . On the right, conservative and religious opponents argue that individual freedom in the non-economic sphere can lead to indifference, selfishness, and immorality. A softer critique of liberalism can be found in Communitarianism , which emphasizes a return to communities without necessarily denigrating individual rights. Beyond these clear theoretical differences, some liberal principles can be treated piecemeal, with some portions kept and others abandoned ''(see Liberal Democracy and Neoliberalism .)'' This ongoing process - where putatively liberal agents accept some traditionally liberal values and reject others - causes some critics to question whether or not the word "liberal" has any useful meaning at all. In terms of international politics, the universal claims of human rights which liberalism tends to endorse is disputed by rigid adherants of non-interventionism, since intervention in the interests of human rights can conflict with the Sovereignty of countries. By contrast, World Federalists criticize liberalism for its adherance to the doctrine of sovereign nation-states, which the World federalists believe is not helpful in the face of genocide and other mass human rights abuses. Left-leaning opponents of economic liberalism reject the view that the private sector can be for the collective benefit, often citing the harm done to those individuals who lose out in competition. They oppose the use of the state to impose market principles on non-liberals, usually through an enforced market mechanism in a previously non-market sector. They argue that the dominance of liberal principles in economy and society has contributed to Inequality among states, and inequality within states. They argue that liberal societies are characterised by long-term Poverty , and by ethnic and class differentials in health, (infant) mortality and life expectancy. Some would even say they have much higher unemployment than centrally planned economies. Liberalism shares many basic goals and methods with social democracy, but in some places diverges. The fundamental difference between liberalism and social democracy, is a disagreement over the role of the state in the economy. Social democracy can be understood to be the common trait, or broader ideology, that overlaps between Social Liberalism and Democratic Socialism . Democratic socialism seeks to achieve some minimum Equality Of Outcome . Democratic socialists support a large Public Sector and the Nationalization of utilities such as gas and electricity in order to avoid private monopolies, and to achieve Social Justice and to raise the standard of living. By contrast, liberalism, in its distrust of monopolies (both public and private), prefers much less state intervention, choosing for example Subsidies and regulation rather than outright nationalization. Liberalism also emphasizes Equality Of Opportunity , and not equality of outcome, citing the desire for a Meritocracy . Anti-statist critiques of liberalism, like some forms of Anarchism , emphasize the illegitimacy of the state for any purposes. Liberal conservatism : ''see main article Liberal Conservatism .'' Liberal conservatism is a hybrid of economic liberalism and Conservative social philosophy. This strain often emerged in countries with strong Socialist and/or Labour Parties , and is often strongly influenced by the writings of Edmund Burke . These partiesExamples include the Reform Party Of Canada , Canadian Alliance , Fine Gael ( Republic Of Ireland ), Party Of The Liberal Front ( Brazil ), Moderate Party (Sweden), the Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) , National Renewal in Chile , and the Liberal Party Of Australia . are mainly member of the International Democratic Union , not of the Liberal International . Liberal international relations theory See Also: Liberal international relations theory "Liberalism" in international relations is a theory that holds that state preferences, rather than state capabilities, are the primary determinant of state behavior. Unlike Realism where the state is seen as a unitary actor, liberalism allows for plurality in state actions. Thus, preferences will vary from state to state, depending on factors such as Culture , Economic System or Government Type . Liberalism also holds that interaction between states is not limited to the political/security ("high politics"), but also economic/cultural ("low politics") whether through commercial firms, organizations or individuals. Thus, instead of an anarchic international system, there are plenty of opportunities for cooperation and broader notions of power, such as cultural capital (for example, the influence of a country's films leading to the popularity of its culture and the creation of a market for its exports worldwide). Another assumption is that Absolute Gain s can be made through co-operation and interdependence - thus peace can be achieved. Liberalism as an international relations theory is not inherently linked to liberalism as a more general domestic political ideology. Increasingly, modern liberals are integrating Critical International Relations Theory into their foreign policy positions. Neoliberalism : ''See main article Neoliberalism .'' Neoliberalism is an economic ideology rather than a broader political ideology. The swing away from government action in the 1970s led to the introduction of this term, which refers to a program of reducing trade barriers and internal market restrictions, while using government power to enforce opening of foreign markets. This is strongly opposed by economic liberals, who favor a , but some also classify Ronald Reagan , Margaret Thatcher and even Tony Blair and Gerhard Schröder as being neo-liberal. It should be noted that, in the 1990s, many social democratic parties adopted 'neoliberal' economic policies such as privatization of industry and open markets, much to the dismay of many of their own voters. This has led these parties to become ''de facto'' neoliberal, and has often resulted in a drastic loss of popular support. For example, critics to the left of the German Social Democratic Party and the British Labour Party accuse them of pursuing neoliberal policies by refusing to renationalise industry. As a result of this, much support for these parties has been lost to the Christian Democratic Union and the Liberal Democrats, respectively. Sometimes 'Neoliberalism' is used as a catch-all term for the anti-socialist reaction which swept through some countries during the period between the 70s and 90s. 'Neoliberalism' in the form of Thatcher, Reagan, and Pinochet claimed to move from a bureacratic welfare-based society toward a meritocracy acting in the interests of business. In actuality, these governments cut funding for education and taxed income more heavily than wealth, which increased the influence of big business and the upper class. Some conservatives see themselves as the true inheritors of classical liberalism. '' Online, December 18, 2001. . Further confusing the classification of liberalism and conservatism is that some conservatives claim liberal values as their own. SEE ALSO
FURTHER READING ON LIBERALISM The literature by thinkers contributing to liberal theory is listed at the Contributions To Liberal Theory .
REFERENCES Notes Other references
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|