| Interpretation Of Quantum Mechanics |
Article Index for Interpretation Of |
Website Links For Interpretation |
Information AboutInterpretation Of Quantum Mechanics |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS | |
| quantum measurement | |
| quantum mechanics | |
|
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The Operational Meaning of the technical terms used by researchers in quantum theory (such as Wavefunction s and Matrix Mechanics ) progressed through various intermediate stages. For instance Schrödinger originally viewed the wavefunction associated to the Electron as the charge density of an object smeared out over an extended, possibly infinite, volume of space. Max Born later proposed its interpretation as the probability distribution in the space of the electron's position. Other leading scientists, such as Albert Einstein , had great difficulty in accepting some of the more radical consequences of the theory, such as Quantum Indeterminacy . Even if these matters could be treated as 'teething troubles', they have lent importance to the activity of interpretation. It should not, however, be assumed that most physicists consider quantum mechanics as requiring interpretation, other than very minimal (see {Link without Title} ). OBSTRUCTIONS TO DIRECT INTERPRETATION The perceived difficulties of interpretation reflect a number of points about the orthodox description of quantum mechanics, including: # The abstract, mathematical nature of the description of quantum mechanics. # The existence of what appear to be non-deterministic and irreversible processes in quantum mechanics. # The phenomenon of entanglement, and in particular, the higher correlations between remote events than would be expected in classical theory. # The complementarity of possible descriptions of reality. First, the accepted Mathematical Structure of quantum mechanics is based on fairly abstract mathematics, such as Hilbert Space s and Operators on those Hilbert spaces. In Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism , on the other hand, properties of a point mass or properties of a field are described by Real Number s or Function s defined on two or three Dimension al sets. These have direct, spatial meaning, and in these theories there seems to be less need to provide a special interpretation for those numbers or functions. Further, the ''process'' of Measurement plays an apparently essential role in the theory. It relates the abstract elements of the theory, such as the Wavefunction , to Operationally Definable values, such as probabilities. Measurement interacts with the system state, in somewhat peculiar ways, as is illustrated by the Double-slit Experiment . The mathematical formalism used to describe the Time Evolution of a non-relativistic system proposes two somewhat different kinds of transformations:
A restricted version of the problem of interpretation in quantum mechanics consists in providing some sort of plausible picture, just for the second kind of transformation. This problem may be addressed by purely mathematical reductions, for example by the Many-worlds or the Consistent Histories interpretations. In addition to the unpredictable and irreversible character of measurement processes, there are other elements of quantum physics that distinguish it sharply from classical physics and which cannot be represented by any classical picture. One of these is the phenomenon of Entanglement , as illustrated in the EPR Paradox , which seemingly violates principles of local causality. Another obstruction to direct interpretation is the phenomenon of Complementarity , which seems to violate basic principles of Propositional Logic . Complementarity says there is no logical picture (obeying classical propositional logic) that can simultaneously describe and be used to reason about all properties of a quantum system S. This is often phrased by saying that there are "complementary" sets ''A'' and ''B'' of propositions that can describe S, but not at the same time. Examples of ''A'' and ''B'' are propositions involving a wave description of S and a corpuscular description of S. The latter statement is one part of Niels Bohr's original formulation, which is often equated to the principle of complementarity itself. Complementarity is not usually taken to mean that classical logic fails, although Hilary Putnam did take that view in his paper Is Logic Empirical? . Instead complementarity means that composition of physical properties for S (such as position and momentum both having values in certain ranges) using propositional connectives does not obey rules of classical propositional logic. As is now well-known (Omnès, 1999) the "origin of complementarity lies in the noncommutativity of operators" describing observables in quantum mechanics. PROBLEMATIC STATUS OF PICTURES AND INTERPRETATIONS The precise ontological status, of each one of the interpreting pictures, remains a matter of philosophical argument. In other words, if we interpret the formal structure ''X'' of quantum mechanics by means of a structure ''Y'' (via a mathematical equivalence of the two structures), what is the status of ''Y''? This is the old question of Saving The Phenomena , in a new guise. Some physicists, for example Asher Peres and Chris Fuchs , seem to argue that an interpretation is nothing more than a formal equivalence between sets of rules for operating on experimental data. This would suggest that the whole exercise of interpretation is unnecessary. INSTRUMENTALIST INTERPRETATION Any modern scientific theory requires at the very least an instrumentalist description which relates the mathematical formalism to experimental practice and prediction. In the case of quantum mechanics, the most common instrumentalist description is an assertion of statistical regularity between state preparation processes and measurement processes. That is, if a measurement of a Real -valued quantity is performed many times, each time starting with the same initial conditions, the outcome is a well-defined Probability Distribution over the real numbers; moreover, quantum mechanics provides a computational instrument to determine statistical properties of this distribution, such as its Expectation Value . Calculations for measurements performed on a system S postulate a s. Repeated measurement of an observable ''A'' for S prepared in state ψ yields a distribution of values. The expectation value of this distribution is given by the expression : This mathematical machinery gives a simple, direct way to compute a statistical property of the outcome of an experiment, once it is understood how to associate the initial state with a vector, and the measured quantity with an observable (that is, a specific Hermitian matrix). As an example of such a computation, the probability of finding the system in a given state is given by computing the expectation value of a (rank-1) Projection Operator : The probability is then the non-negative real number given by : By abuse of language, the bare instrumentalist description can be referred to as an interpretation, although this usage is somewhat misleading since instrumentalism explicitly avoids any explanatory role; that is, it does not attempt to answer the question of what quantum mechanics is talking about. SUMMARY OF COMMON INTERPRETATIONS OF QM Properties of interpretations An interpretation can be characterized by whether it satisfies certain properties, such as:
To explain these properties, we need to be more explicit about the kind of picture an interpretation provides. To that end we will regard an interpretation as a correspondence between the elements of the mathematical formalism M and the elements of an interpreting structure '''I''', where:
In this sense, an interpretation can be regarded as a Semantics for the mathematical formalism. In particular, the bare instrumentalist view of quantum mechanics outlined in the previous section is not an interpretation at all since it makes no claims about elements of physical reality. The current use in physics of "completeness" and "realism" is often considered to have originated in the paper (Einstein et al., 1935) which proposed the EPR Paradox . In that paper the authors proposed the concept "element of reality" and "completeness" of a physical theory. Though they did not define "element of reality", they did provide a sufficient characterization for it, namely a quantity whose value can be predicted with certainty before measuring it or disturbing it in any way. EPR define a "complete physical theory" as one in which every element of physical reality is accounted for by the theory. In the semantic view of interpretation, an interpretation of a theory is complete if every element of the interpreting structure is accounted for by the mathematical formalism. Realism is a property of each one of the elements of the mathematical formalism; any such element is real if it corresponds to something in the interpreting structure. For instance, in some interpretations of quantum mechanics (such as the many-worlds interpretation) the ket vector associated to the system state is assumed to correspond to an element of physical reality, while in others it does not. Determinism is a property characterizing state changes due to the passage of time, namely that the state at an instant of time in the future is a Function of the state at the present (see Time Evolution ). It may not always be clear whether a particular interpreting structure is deterministic or not, precisely because there may not be a clear choice for a time parameter. Moreover, a given theory may have two interpretations, one of which is deterministic, and the other not. Local realism has two parts:
A precise formulation of local realism in terms of a Local Hidden Variable Theory was proposed by John Bell. Bell's Theorem and its experimental verification restrict the kinds of properties a quantum theory can have. For instance, Bell's theorem implies quantum mechanics cannot satisfy local realism. Many worlds The Many-worlds Interpretation (or MWI) is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that rejects the non-deterministic and irreversible wavefunction collapse associated with measurement in the Copenhagen interpretation in favor of a description in terms of quantum entanglement and reversible time evolution of states. The phenomena associated with measurement are explained by decoherence which occurs when states interact with the environment. The Copenhagen Interpretation The Copenhagen Interpretation is an interpretation of quantum mechanics formulated by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg while collaborating in Copenhagen around 1927. Bohr and Heisenberg extended the probabilistic interpretation of the wavefunction, proposed by Max Born. The Copenhagen interpretation rejects questions like "where was the particle before I measured its position" as meaningless. The act of measurement causes an instantaneous "collapse of the wave function". This means that the measurement process randomly picks out exactly one of the many possibilities allowed for by the state's wave function, and the wave function instantaneously changes to reflect that pick. Quantum Logic Quantum Logic can be regarded as a kind of propositional logic suitable for understanding the apparent anomalies regarding quantum measurement, most notably those concerning composition of measurement operations of complementary variables. This research area and its name originated in the 1936 paper by Garrett Birkhoff and John Von Neumann , who attempted to reconcile some of the apparent inconsistencies of classical boolean logic with the facts related to measurement and observation in quantum mechanics. The Bohm interpretation The Bohm Interpretation of quantum mechanics is an interpretation postulated by David Bohm in which the existence of a non-local universal wavefunction allows distant particles to interact instantaneously. The interpretation generalizes Louis De Broglie 's pilot wave theory from 1927, which posits that both wave and particle are real. The wave function 'guides' the motion of the particle, and evolves according to the Schrödinger equation. The interpretation assumes a single, nonsplitting universe (unlike the Everett many-worlds interpretation) and is deterministic (unlike the Copenhagen interpretation). It says the state of the universe evolves smoothly through time, without the collapsing of wavefunctions when a measurement occurs, as in the Copenhagen interpretation. However, it does this by assuming a number of hidden variables, namely the positions of all the particles in the universe, which, like probability amplitudes in other interpretations, can never be measured directly. Transactional interpretation The Transactional Interpretation of quantum mechanics (TIQM) by John Cramer is an unusual interpretation of quantum mechanics that describes quantum interactions in terms of a standing wave formed by retarded (forward-in-time) and advanced (backward-in-time) waves. The author argues that it avoids the philosophical problems with the Copenhagen interpretation and the role of the observer, and resolves various quantum paradoxes. Consciousness causes collapse Consciousness Causes Collapse is the speculative theory that observation by a conscious observer is responsible for the wavefunction collapse. It is an attempt to solve the Wigner's Friend paradox by simply stating that collapse occurs at the first "conscious" observer. Supporters claim this is not a revival of substance dualism, since (in a ramification of this view) consciousness and objects are entangled and cannot be considered as distinct. The consciousness causes collapse theory can be considered as a speculative appendage to almost any interpretation of quantum mechanics and most physicists reject it as unverifiable and introducing unnecessary elements into physics. COMPARISON At the moment, there is no experimental evidence that would allow us to distinguish between the various interpretations listed below. To that extent, the physical theory stands, and is consistent with, itself and with reality; troubles come only when one attempts to "interpret" it. Nevertheless, there is active research in attempting to come up with experimental tests which would allow differences between the interpretations to be experimentally tested. Some of the most common interpretations are summarized here (however, the assignment of values in this table is not without controversy, for the precise meanings of some of the concepts involved are unclear and, in fact, the subject of the very controversy itself): 1Many Worlds has no hidden variables, except for the multiple worlds themselves. 2Bohm/de Broglie say both particle AND wavefunction ("guide wave") are real. 3Technically there is one universal wavefunction and decoherence should prevent macroscopic superposition. Each interpretation has many variants. It is difficult to get a precise definition of the Copenhagen Interpretation — in the table above, two classical variants and one new version of the Copenhagen Interpretation is shown — one that regards the waveform as being a tool for calculating probabilities only, and the other regards the waveform as an "element of reality". SEE ALSO
Related lists REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|