Homosexuality And Christianity Article Index for
Homosexuality And
Website Links For
Homosexuality
 

Information About

Homosexuality And Christianity




See Also: List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality


The issue of Homosexuality and Christianity has become a matter of intense Theological debate among some Christians , with ongoing argument over whether Homosexuality , and specifically homosexual Sex , is Immoral or a Sin .

Traditionally, Christian churches have regarded homosexual sex as sinful, based on their interpretation of certain passages in the Bible . This position is still affirmed by the largest Christian Denominations , including the Roman Catholic Church , the Eastern Orthodox Church , and most Protestant denominations, especially among Evangelicals such as the Southern Baptist Convention . However, there has been a minority of interpreters who have advanced a different understanding of these passages and have argued that homosexuality can be seen as moral. This approach has been taken by a number of churches, notably the Metropolitan Community Church .

Within denominations which still officially regard homosexual sex as sinful, there are also theologians who take the opposite view. Most notably, the Anglican Communion 's leader, the Archbishop Of Canterbury , Rowan Williams , regards same-sex relationships as moral, while most churches within the Anglican Communion do not hold this position. Many denominations have therefore experienced deep divisions over this topic, including the Anglican Communion, especially after the consecration of Gene Robinson as a Bishop in the Episcopal Church In The United States Of America , who was the first openly Gay Bishop in the Communion.


THE BIBLE AND HOMOSEXUALITY

See Also: The Bible and homosexuality



The Bible is regarded by most Christians as inspired by God or at least recording God's relationship with humanity and includes within it certain Moral teachings. Passages from the Bible commonly used in the debate over homosexuality include Leviticus 18 and 21, Romans 1, 1 Timothy 1:10 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. The arguments over these passages have centered on the extent to which these passages are still relevant; whether they refer only to certain sexual acts or to homosexual orientation; and how they should be interpreted, understood and applied.


EARLY CHRISTIANITY

Many argued in the fourth century that homosexual intercourse is worse than murder and so degrading that it constitutes a kind of punishment in itself, and that their enjoyment actually makes it worse, "for suppose I were to see a person running naked, with his body all besmeared with mire, and yet not covering himself, but exulting in it, I should not rejoice with him, but should rather bewail that he did not even perceive that he was doing shamefully." He also said:

:But nothing can there be more worthless than a man who has pandered himself. For not the soul only, but the body also of one who hath been so treated, is disgraced, and deserves to be driven out everywhere.

At the same time, the early Christians were under no delusion about the strength of the temptation. The monasteries in particular came under suspicion, and the practices therein led to a saying, that , ''With wine and boys around, the monks have no need of the Devil to tempt them.'' (Abbott, E. (2000) ''A History of Celibacy''. New York; p. 101)

The Council Of Ancyra (314) prescribed a penance of at least twenty years' duration for those guilty of "bestial lust" There is dispute whether this reference is to homosexuality or bestiality, but it was received in the West as governing penances for sodomy [http://krotov.info/spravki/temy/g/gomosex2.html .

Not everyone agrees that the wealth of condemnations are fully characteristic of early Christianity. Namely, Historian in the 12th Century , which he claims was also reflected in other ways. This theory seems impossible according to the numerous doctrinal sources before the twelfth century that condemned homosexual intercourse.
See Also: History of Christianity and homosexuality




THE MIDDLE AGES


The most influential theologian of the Medieval period is Thomas Aquinas , regarded by Catholics as a Doctor Of The Church . His Moral Theology contained a strong element of Teleological Natural Law . On his view, not all things to which a person might be inclined are "natural" in the morally relevant sense; rather, only the inclination to the full and proper expression of the human nature, and inclinations which align with that inclination, are natural. Contrary inclinations are perversions of the natural in the sense that they do seek a good, but in a way destructive of good.

This view points from the natural to the Divine, because (following by examining the forms and purposes of those aspects. It is in this sense that Aquinas considered homosexuality unnatural, since it involves a kind of partner other than the kind to which the purpose of sexuality points. Indeed, he considered it second only to bestiality as an abuse of sexuality .

An earlier Doctor of the Church, St. Peter Damian , wrote the ''Liber Gomorrhianus'', an extended attack on homosexuality and even masturbation . He portrayed homosexuality as a counter-rational force undermining morality, religion, and society itself , and in need of strong suppression lest it spread even and especially among clergy .

Hildegard Of Bingen , born seven years after the death of St. Peter Damian, reported seeing visions and recorded them in ''Scivias'' (short for ''Scito vias Domini'', "Know the Ways of the Lord" ). In Book II Vision Six, she quotes God as condemning same-sex intercourse, including lesbianism; "a woman who takes up devilish ways and plays a male role in coupling with another woman is most vile in My sight, and so is she who subjects herself to such a one in this evil deed".

Her younger contemporary Alain De Lille personified the theme of sexual sin in opposition to nature in ''The Complaint of Nature'' by having nature herself denounce sexual immorality and especially homosexuality as rebellion against her direction, terming it confusion between masculine and feminine and between subject and object. The ''Complaint'' also includes a striking description of the neglect of womanhood:

:Though all the beauty of man humbles itself before the fairness of woman, being always inferior to her glory; though the face of the daughter of Tyndaris is brought into being and the comeliness of Adonis and Narcissus, conquered, adores her; for all this she is scorned, although she speaks as beauty itself, though her godlike grace affirms her to be a goddess, though for her the thunderbolt would fail in the hand of Jove, and every sinew of Apollo would pause and lie inactive, though for her the free man would become a slave, and Hippolytus, to enjoy her love, would sell his very chastity. Why do so many kisses lie untouched on maiden lips, and no one wish to gain a profit from them?

The tone of the denunciations often indicate a more than theoretical concern. Archbishop Ralph of Tours had his lover John installed as bishop of Orleans with agreement of both the King of of the Lollards included the denunciation of priestly celibacy as a cause of sodomy {Link without Title} .


EARLY MODERNITY


King '', lists sodomy among those “horrible crimes which ye are bound in conscience never to forgive.”

An Italian text published anonymously in 1652 by Antonio Rocco, ''L'Alcibiade fanciullo a scola'', was about a teacher's successful attempt to persuade the much younger Alcibiades to have sex with him. Although set in ancient Greece, it includes much anacronistic material, especially pertaining to Christian arguments, and denounces the story of Sodom and Gomorrah as a fiction made up by the Hebrew elders. {Link without Title}

In France a similar text, '' Histoire De Dom Bougre, Portier Des Chartreux '', written in 1741 , mocks biblical injunctions and extols same-sex love, as does Voltaire's ''The Bible finally explained'' ( 1776 ). It was followed by the Marquis de Sade who in his ''Dialogue entre un prêtre et un moribond'' of 1782 denounces religion (and other morality codes) as "man-made." In England the pseudo-Byronian poem "Don Leon" (written in the voice of Byron but of uncertain authorship, published in 1866 ) vehemently denounced the abusive treatment inflicted on homosexuals as based on a dubious tale.
::I grant that casuists the Bible quote,
::And tell us how God’s tardy vengeance smote
:: Lot's native town with brimstone from the sky,
::To punish this impure delinquency,
::Unmindful that the drunkard's kiss defiled
::(Whilst yet the embers smoked), his virgin child.
::But reason doubts the Jewish prophet’s tale.


THE MODERN CONTROVERSY



Prolegomenal issues

There are several theological issues which have been considered extensively by Christian thinkers long before the contemporary debate about homosexuality which have become issues in the debate, or which influence the positions taken.


The basis of theology

Many of the debates among Christians relate to, or derive from, differences in what is taken as providing authoritative information about God and his will, or more generally which kinds of arguments should be persuasive for Christians.

In traditional Christianity Scripture is understood as the central authority, and in some traditions as the only truly definitive authority (a position called Sola Scriptura ). Exegesis , or the reasoned study of the text to discover its own meaning, is a central concern, especially for believers in Sola Scriptura. The classic formulation of Sola Scriptura regards "good and necessary deduction" from Scripture as authoritative; what these deductions might be is a frequent subject of controversy. [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/history/chicago.stm.txt [http://www.mbrem.com/bible/sufficn.htm]

Additional authorities are accepted by other traditions. Catholics and Eastern Orthodox regard ).

Liberal Christians consider the Bible a document of the human authors' beliefs and feelings about God at the time of its writing, which may reflect a heightened spiritual consciousness, or which may simply be primitive and wrong; liberal Christians often dismiss Biblical teachings, especially accounts of miracles such as the Virgin Birth . {Link without Title}


Choice and free will

The existence and nature of Free Will is a topic in Philosophy Of Mind and theology. Incompatibilism is the view that determinism is at odds with free will, while compatibilism holds the two are not contradictory. Compatibilists such as Hobbes generally claim that a person acts freely only in the case where the person willed the act and the person could (hypothetically) have done otherwise ''if the person had decided to''; what matters, Hobbes believed, is that choices are the results of desires and preferences, and are not overridden by force. (See Compatibilism And Incompatibilism .) [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/

In the history of theology, debates about the issue have happened between , Western Christianity officially adopted a form of compatibilist determinism known as Original Sin , according to which the sin of Adam And Eve has corrupted the whole human race such that humans are unable to refrain from sin, yet remain accountable, and cannot even desire holiness apart from Divine intervention {Link without Title} . However, belief in free will remains popular and many even regard free will as a basic doctrine of Christianity.

Among incompatibilists, the question of how voluntary homosexuality is, and what voluntariness might mean in this context, is a central concern in considering its morality. The . Most Psychologists do not consider sexual orientation chosen (although there are notable exceptions; see Robert Skinner , for example), and many homosexuals report that they do not experience homosexuality as a choice {Link without Title} .


POSITIONS OF SPECIFIC DENOMINATIONS


See Also: List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality



The many Christian Denominations vary in their position on homosexuality, from seeing it as sinful, through being divided on the issue, to seeing it as moral. Among those that see it as sinful, there is further variance regarding whether it is the homosexual ''orientation'' that is immoral, or only homosexual ''acts''.


SEE ALSO



REFERENCES

  • Bates, Stephen (2004). ''A Church at War: Anglicans and Homosexuality''. I.B. Tauris . ISBN 1850434808.

  • Boswell, John (1980). ''Christianity, social tolerance, and homosexuality: Gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century''. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226067106

  • Crompton, Louis, et al.; ''Homosexuality and Civilization'' Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003. ISBN 067401197X

  • Gagnon, Robert A.J. (2002). ''The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics''. Abingdon Press. ISBN 0687022797

  • Harvey, John F., O.S.F.S. (1996). ''The Truth about Homosexuality: The Cry of the Faithful, introduction by Benedict J. Groeschel, C.F.R.''. Ignatius Press . ISBN 0898705835.

  • Helminiak, Daniel A. (2000). "Frequently Asked Questions About Being Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Transgender and Catholic" Dignity USA. <>

  • Hildegard Of Bingen , "Scivias," Columba Hart and Jane Bishop, translators; New York: Paulist Press, 1990

  • Johansson, Warren "Whosoever Shall Say To His Brother, Racha." ''Studies in Homosexuality, Vol XII: Homosexuality and Religion and Philosophy.'' Ed. Wayne Dynes & Stephen Donaldson. New York & London: Garland, 1992. pp. 212-214

  • Saletan, William (''.



EXTERNAL LINKS


# That which is unnatural: Homosexuality in Society, the Church, and Scripture