| Hilton Bombing |
Website Links For Sydney |
Information AboutHilton Bombing |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT SYDNEY HILTON BOMBING | |
| 1978 in australia | |
| terrorist incidents in the 1970s | |
| history of sydney | |
| crime in sydney | |
| terrorism in australia | |
|
THE BOMBING The bomb, planted in a immediately called out the Army to guard the remainder of the CHOGRM meeting {Link without Title} . Although the bombing has been described as a Terrorist act, there is no consensus concerning who perpetrated it. INQUIRIES, TRIALS AND ROYAL COMMISSION The bombing played a role in the 1978 arrest of three members of the social and spiritual organisation Ananda Marga – Tim Anderson , Ross Dunn and Paul Alister – on charges of conspiracy to murder the Sydney leader of the National Front, which the prosecution associated with the Sydney Hilton bombing. A Royal Commission , headed by Justice Hope the Royal Commissioner, was established into the conviction of the Ananda Margis, and eventually recommended their pardon, but did not cover the Hilton Bombing. They were pardoned and released in 1985. Thereafter, Anderson was arrested for the Sydney Hilton bombing, but this time he was acquitted in 1991 after the evidence of the main prosecution witness, Evan Pederick, was completely rejected by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. {Link without Title} Paradoxically, Pederick, now having served his relatively short sentence, remains the only person convicted of the Hilton Hotel Bombing even though his evidence has been roundly rejected. Even former prime minister Malcolm Fraser felt compelled to point out the serious flaws in Pederick's claims. Pederick pleaded guilty to the crime and was quickly convicted without detailed scrutiny of his confession. Until 1989, when Evan Pederick came forward, no one actually claimed responsibility for the bombing and there is still controversy over whether the true perpetrators have yet to be discovered. SPECULATION AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES The India n prime minister Morarji Desai claimed that Ananda Marga had attempted to kill him due to the imprisonment of the organisation's spiritual leader, Shrii Shrii Anandamurti . This has been alleged by some as a motive for framing the Ananda Marga Three. However, there has been controversy about the motives of the bomb and the handling of the case that surrounded it. Terry Griffiths, a former policeman who was seriously injured in the bombing, has claimed that the bombing was somehow a conspiracy and called for an inquiry. G Barry Hall QC, counsel for Griffiths, argued that ASIO may well have planted the bomb in order to justify their existence. The Hon Peter Collins, the NSW Liberal Attorney-General led a campaign to demand a joint State-Federal inquiry which culminated in a unanimous resolution by both houses of the NSW parliament - only the second time in the history of the state that such a resolution had been adopted. The Federal government vetoed any inquiry. POLITICAL EFFECTS AND SIGNIFICANCE The episode is generally erroneously regarded as the first and only domestic Terrorist event to hit Australia's shores and had a profound impact on the nation (erroneous because terrorism struck Australia earlier when a series of bombings in Sydney and Melbourne stretching from the late 1960s to the early 1970s, of Yugoslav businesses by Croatian extremists, claimed more lives and did more damage). It highlighted the corruption which blighted the New South Wales Police Service and resulted in mounting pressure on the Commonwealth for increased support for the anti-terrorism activities of the intelligence services. SEE ALSO REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING
|
|
|