| Ham Lake, Minnesota |
Article Index for Ham |
Limousines in Ham Lake |
Website Links For Ham Lake |
Information AboutHam Lake, Minnesota |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT HAM LAKE, MINNESOTA | |
| anoka county, minnesota | |
| cities in minnesota | |
|
GEOGRAPHY According to the United States Census Bureau , the city has a total area of 92.5 Km&2 (35.7 Mi&2 ). 89.2 km&2 (34.5 mi&2) of it is land and 3.2 km&2 (1.2 mi&2) of it is water. The total area is 3.50% water. DEMOGRAPHICS As of the Census 2 of 2000, there were 12,710 people, 4,139 households, and 3,472 families residing in the city. The Population Density was 142.4/km&2 (368.9/mi&2). There were 4,208 housing units at an average density of 47.2/km&2 (122.1/mi&2). The racial makeup of the city was 96.70% White , 0.50% African American , 0.39% Native American , 0.76% Asian , 0.04% Pacific Islander , 0.37% from Other Races , and 1.25% from two or more races. 1.14% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race. There were 4,139 households out of which 45.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 74.0% were Married Couples living together, 6.0% had a female householder with no husband present, and 16.1% were non-families. 11.4% of all households were made up of individuals and 2.5% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 3.07 and the average family size was 3.33. In the city the population was spread out with 31.0% under the age of 18, 7.5% from 18 to 24, 33.8% from 25 to 44, 23.4% from 45 to 64, and 4.2% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females there were 109.3 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 106.2 males. The median income for a household in the city was $67,750, and the median income for a family was $71,905. Males had a median income of $44,462 versus $31,239 for females. The Per Capita Income for the city was $24,329. 2.1% of the population and 1.2% of families were below the Poverty Line . 1.3% of those under the age of 18 and 3.0% of those 65 and older were living below the poverty line. |
|
|