Employee Voice Article Index for
Employee
Website Links For
Employee
 

Information About

Employee Voice




Employee voice is a term that is coming into wide use with both pratictioners and academics in the context of Human Resource Management (HRM) and Industrial Relations (IR). It was popularised by Freeman and Medoff (1984) who argued that it
made good sense for both company and workforce to have a voice mechanism.

Voice, the right to be heard and have a say over important workplace issues and at times an acknowledgement of differing interests, may be essential for achieving greater employee satisfaction and commitment’’.


UNION VOICE

Traditionally employee voice has been achieved via unions, with unions representing the collective interests of employees.


NON-UNION VOICE


However with union memberships in decline in many industries and as a unions influence over business, other vehicles for voice are starting to emerge.

A common concept voice of voice in non unioned companies was a suggestions scheme (used in over half of non unioned companies surveyed (The management of voice in non-union organisations: managers’ perspectives, Tony Dundon)


MANAGERS UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPT OF VOICE


Feedback from “colleagues” company’s term for employees is probably how I would
understand the term {Link without Title} . Comments on the business are vital to our success – which is
why we value the suggestion scheme so highly.

''Manager, HiFi Sounds''

The term has a resonance with me. I started off in the ranks myself and have always been very keen that employees have a view. After all, they are actually face-to-face with customers, not the managing director, so I rely very much on what they are able to filter up.

''Managing director, Leisure Co.''

voice as a form of “democracy that exists in the organisation”
Personnel Manager, Housing Association

Arguably, employee voice (for both union and non-union workers) is part of a shared human rights agenda, predicated on diversity, equality of opportunity and procedural justice.

Voice is about having opinions and observations heard. How voice is realised, recognised and acted upon is what matters. There is no “real” voice if it is not listened to”
General manager, Consultancy Co.


EXPECTED OUTCOME BY GRANTING EMPLOYEE VOICE


  • More open IR climate




PROBLEMS


  • a lack of employee enthusiasm

  • an absence of appropriate managerial skills to implement voice




ORGANISATIONAL SILENCE

organisational silence is when the employee’s choice to ‘‘withhold their opinions and
concerns about organisational problems’’ and Milliken (2000)

Silence is the opposite of voice. It occurs when employees feel scared of, or do not trust their managers, and as a consequence do not approach them with ideas or concerns. The consequence of such is that people only talk about problems in private, (which means managers may not even be aware of it).

This should be a major concern to any organisations in the “knowledge economy” which depend of people who are responsive to the challenges of the environment, who are not afraid to share information and knowledge, who can stand up for their own and their team beliefs.

Some managers have lived for so long in environments where fear, intimidation and silence
are the norms, that they can not imagine an alternative way of working and behaving. (1999)


FIXING SILENCE


Managers need to identify the silent groups and people within the organisations and identify their key issues, and then do something about them.

Some technologies such a polls and surveys via intranets can give employees the ability to by pass their managers to ensure their voice is heard.


REFERENCES


The management of voice in non-union organisations: managers’ perspectives
Tony Dundon, Adrian Wilkinson, Mick Marchington, Peter Ackers

Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation
Maria Vakola, Dimitris Bouradas