| Diplomatic Minister |
Article Index for Diplomatic |
Information AboutDiplomatic Minister |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT DIPLOMATIC RANK | |
| diplomacy | |
|
TRADITIONAL DIPLOMACY Until the early 19th Century , each Europe an nation had its own system of diplomatic rank. The relative ranks of diplomats from different nations had been a source of considerable dispute, made more so by the insistence of major nations to have their diplomats ranked higher than those of minor nations, to be reflected in such things as table seatings. In an attempt to resolve the problem, the Congress Of Vienna of 1815 formally established an international system of diplomatic ranks. The four ranks within the system were: 1. Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, or simply Ambassador , who is a representative of the head of state. Equivalent, and in some traditions '' Primus Inter Pares '', is the Papal Nuncio . Amongst Commonwealth countries, the equivalent title High Commissioner (who represents the government rather than the head of state) is normally used instead. A Diplomatic Mission headed by an ambassador would be known as an ''Embassy''; one headed by a High Commissioner is called a ''High Commission''. An ambassador is entitled to use the title "His/Her Excellency ". 2. Minister Plenipotentiary (in full '''Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary'''), or simply Envoy. Usually just referred to as a Minister, an envoy is a diplomatic representative with Plenipotentiary powers (i.e. full authority to represent the head of state), but ranking below an Ambassador. 3. Minister Resident or '''Resident Minister''', or simply Minister, is the, now extremely rare, lowest rank of full Diplomatic Mission chief, only above Chargé D'affaires (who is considered an extraordinary substitute).
4. Chargé d'affaires, or simply Chargé . As the French title suggests, a chargé d'affaires would be in charge of an embassy's or a legation's affairs in the (usually temporary) absence of a more senior diplomat. As it turned out, this system of diplomatic rank did nothing to solve the problem of the nations' precedence. The appropriate diplomatic ranks used would be determined by the precedence among the nations; thus the exchanges of ambassadors (the highest diplomatic rank) would be reserved among major nations, or close allies and related monarchies. In contrast, a major nation would probably send just an envoy to a minor nation, who in return would send an envoy to the major nation. As a result, the United States did not use the rank of ambassador until their emergence as a major world power at the end of the 19th Century . Indeed, until the mid-20th Century, the majority of diplomats in the world were of the rank of envoy. In diplomatic parlance, all the diplomats that station inside a nation is known as the Diplomatic Corps ; one of these diplomats is recognized as the '' Primus Inter Pares '' - in practice rather a protocolic honor - who act as the spokesperson for all, known as the dean of the diplomatic corps (often by length of service, although in some Catholic nations it is held ex officio by the Papal Nuncio) or as Marshal Of Diplomacy . After World War II , it was no longer considered acceptable to treat some nations as inferior to others given the United Nations doctrine of equality of sovereign states. Consequently the use of the ranks of envoy and minister resident for legation chiefs gradually ceased. Where those ranks still exist, these usually act as mere embassy section chiefs. MODERN DIPLOMATS Bilateral diplomacy In modern diplomatic practice there are a number of diplomatic ranks below Ambassador. Since most missions are now headed by an Ambassador, these ranks now rarely indicate a mission's (or its host nation's) relative importance, but rather reflect the diplomat's individual seniority within their own nation's diplomatic career path and in the Diplomatic Corps in the host nation:
In the United States Foreign Service, a system of personal ranks is applied which roughly corresponds to these diplomatic ranks. Personal ranks are differentiated as "Senior Foreign Service" (SFS) or "Foreign Service Officer" (FSO). The SFS ranks, in descending order, are Career Ambassador, awarded to career diplomats with extensive and distinguished service; Career Minister, the highest regular senior rank; Minister-Counselor; and Counselor. These correspond to 4-, 3-, 2- and 1-star General and Flag officers in the military, respectively. Officers at these ranks may serve as Ambassadors and the most senior positions in diplomatic missions. FSO ranks descend from FSO-1, equivalent to a colonel in the military, to FSO-9, the lowest, entry-level officer rank in the U.S. Foreign Service personnel system. Personal rank is distinct from and should not be confused with the diplomatic or consular rank assigned at the time of appointment to a particular diplomatic or consular mission. In a large mission, several Senior Foreign Service Officers may serve under the Ambassador as Minister-Counselors, Counselors, First Secretaries, and Attaches; in a small mission, an FSO-2 may serve as the lone Minister-Counselor of Embassy. Multilateral diplomacy Furthermore, outside this traditional pattern of bilateral diplomacy, as a rule on a permanent residency basis (though sometimes doubling elsewhere), certain ranks and positions were created specifically for multilateral diplomacy:
Consular counterpart Formally the Consular Career (ranking in descending order: Consul-General, Consul, Vice-Consul, Honorary Consul) forms a different hierarchy, with a similar but less prestigious status (for example, a Consul-General is usually considered to be of the same rank as a Chargé d'affaires). Consular officers, being more distant from the politically sensitive aspects of diplomacy, can easier render a wide range of services to private citizens, enterprises, et cetera. They are more numerous since diplomatic missions are posted only in a nation's capital, while consular officials station in various other cities as well. However it is not uncommon for individuals to be transferred from one hierarchy to the other, and for consular officials to serve in a capital carrying out strictly consular duties within the 'consular section' of a diplomatic post, e.g. within an embassy. SEE ALSO
SOURCES AND REFERENCES (incomplete)
|
|
|