Diffraction

Article Index for Diffraction

Articles about Diffraction

Information About Diffraction

	CATEGORIES ABOUT DIFFRACTION
	fundamental physics concepts
	diffraction
	wave mechanicsfundamental physics concepts
	diffraction
	wave mechanics
	physical optics
	wave mechanics
	crystallography
	spectroscopy

	APPAREL
	BABY
	BEAUTY
	BOOKS
	CAR TOYS
	CELL PHONES
	DVD'S
	ELECTRONICS
	GOURMET FOOD
	GROCERIES
	HEALTH & PERSONAL
	HOME & GARDEN
	JEWELRY
	MUSIC
	MUSIC INSTRUMENTS
	OFFICE PRODUCTS
	SOFTWARE
	SPORTING GOODS
	TOOLS & HARDWARE
	TOYS
	VIDEO GAMES
	SHOPPING HOME
	MORE SHOPPING...

Diffraction is a particular type of wave interference, caused by the partial obstruction or lateral restriction of a wave. The interference is undergone by Electromagnetic Waves such as Light and Radio Waves . Diffraction also occurs when any group of waves of a finite size is propagating; for example, a narrow beam of Light waves from a Laser must, because of diffraction of the beam, eventually diverge into a wider beam at a sufficient distance from the laser. As a simple example of diffraction, if you speak into one end of a cardboard tube, the sound waves emerging from the other end spread out in all directions, rather than propagating in a straight line like a stream of water from a garden hose. INTRODUCTION It is important to understand that not all interference is diffraction; for example, sound waves emitted by two stereo speakers will interfere with each other if they are of the same frequency and have a definite phase relationship, but this is not diffraction. Diffraction will not occur if the wave is not Coherent , and diffraction effects become weaker (and ultimately undetectable) as the size of obstruction is made larger and larger compared to the wavelength. In well-defined cases, a diffraction pattern may be observed. Diffraction is not the same as Refraction , although both are phenomena in which a wave does not propagate in a single direction. Refraction is not an interference phenomenon, and, e.g., can occur without coherence. It is the diffraction of "particles," such as electrons, which stood as one of the powerful arguments in favor of Quantum Mechanics . It is possible to observe diffraction of particles such as Neutrons or Electron s and hence we are able to infer the existence of Wave-particle Duality . Indeed, this diffraction is a useful tool; the wavelengths of these particle-waves are small enough that they are used as probes of the atomic structure of crystals. See Electron Diffraction and Neutron Diffraction . ''Double-slit diffraction'' Double-slit diffraction (''red laser light'') ''2-slit and 5-slit diffraction'' The most conceptually simple example of diffraction is double-slit diffraction in which both slits have relatively narrow widths compared to the Wavelength of the wave. Suppose, for the sake of visualization, that these are water waves. After passing through the slits, two overlapping patterns of semicircular ripples are formed, as shown in the first figure. Where a crest overlaps with a crest, a double-height crest will be formed; this is constructive Interference . Constructive interference also occurs where a trough overlaps another trough. However, when a trough and a crest overlap, they cancel out; the interference is destructive. The second figure shows the result of this process with light waves of a single wavelength originating from a laser. The constructive-interference locations are called maxima, because they have maximum brightness. The destructive-interference locations are the minima. Historically, the first proof that light was a wave phenomenon came from the Double-slit Experiment of Thomas Young . GENERAL FACTS ABOUT DIFFRACTION Several qualitative observations can be made: The angular spacing of the features in the diffraction pattern is inversely proportional to the dimensions of the object causing the diffraction, in other words: the smaller the diffracting object the 'wider' the resulting diffraction pattern and vice versa. (More precisely, this is true of the Sine s of the angles.) The diffraction angles are invariant under scaling; that is, they depend only on the ratio of the wavelength to a dimension, ''a'', of the diffracting object. When the diffracting object is repeated, the effect is to narrow each maximum, concentrating its energy within a narrower range of angles. The third figure, for example, shows a comparison of a double-slit pattern with a pattern formed by five slits, both sets of slits having the same spacing, ''a'', between the center of one slit and the next. MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION It is mathematically easier to consider the case of far-field or Fraunhofer Diffraction , where the diffracting obstruction is far from the point at which the wave is measured. The more general case is known as near-field or Fresnel Diffraction , and involves more complex mathematics. As the observation distance is increased the results predicted by the Fresnel theory converge towards those predicted by the simpler Fraunhofer theory. This article considers far-field diffraction, which is commonly observed in nature. Quantitatively, the angular positions of the minima in multiple-slit diffraction are given by the equation The central maximum is two orders wide, however, so ''m'' = 0, θ = 0 is the absolute maximum of the distribution and intensity functions. This is a form of Bragg's law (see below). ''Graph and image'' Quantitative analysis of single-slit diffraction As an example, an exact equation can now be derived for the intensity of the diffraction pattern as a function of angle in the case of single-slit diffraction. A mathematical representation of Huygens' Principle can be used to start an equation. Consider a monochromatic complex plane wave $\backslash Psi^\backslash prime$ of wavelength λ incident on a slit of width ''a''. If the slit lies in the x′-y′ plane, with its center at the origin, then it can be assumed that diffraction generates a complex wave ψ, traveling radially in the r direction away from the slit, and this is given by: : let (x′,y′,0) be a point inside the slit over which it is being integrated. If (x,0,z) is the location at which the intensity of the diffraction pattern is being computed, the slit extends from $x^\backslash prime=-a/2$ to $+a/2\backslash ,$, and from $y\text{'}=-\backslash infty$ to $\backslash infty$. The distance ''r'' from the slot is: :$r\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{\backslash left(x\; -\; x^\backslash prime\; ight)^2\; +\; y^\{\backslash prime2\}\; +\; z^2\}$ : : It can be seen that 1/''r'' in front of the equation is non-oscillatory, i.e. its contribution to the magnitude of the intensity is small compared to our exponential factors. Therefore, we will lose little accuracy by approximating it as ''z''.

Now, substituting in , the intensity ''I'' of the diffracted waves at an angle θ is given by:

where the sinc function is given by sinc(''x'') = sin(''x'')/''x''.


Quantitative analysis of ''n''-slit diffraction


Let us again start with the mathematical representation of Huygens' Principle .

:

Consider ''n'' slits in the prime plane of the equal size (''a'', $\backslash infty$, 0) and spacing ''d'' spread along the x′ axis. As above, the distance ''r'' from the slit 1 is:

:

To generalize this to ''n'' slits, we make the observation that while ''z'' and ''y'' remain constant, x′ shifts by

:$x\_\{j=0\; \backslash cdots\; n-1\}^\{\backslash prime\}\; =\; x\_0^\backslash prime\; -\; j\; d$

Thus

:

and the sum of all n contributions to the wave function is:

:

Again noting that is small, so , we have:












Substituting into our equation, we find:

:<math>\langle E^{ix} \Big E^{ix} Angle\ e^0 = 1</math> Review our Terms of Service. © Copyright 2003-2009. Information About, Where you can have ALL your shopping needs met without unwanted poppups and clutter. If you have any comments, please write to info@informationdelight.info.