Conservative Party (uk) Leadership Election, 2005 Article Index for
Conservative Party
Shopping
Conservative
Website Links For
Conservative Party
 

Information About

Conservative Party (uk) Leadership Election, 2005




The 2005 Conservative leadership election was announced by party leader Michael Howard on May 6 2005 , when he announced that he would be stepping down as leader in the near future. However, he stated that he would not depart until a review of the rules for the leadership election had been conducted, given the high level of dissatisfaction with the current system. Ultimately, no changes were made and the election is proceeding with the existing rules, which were introduced in 1998 .

The contest formally began on 7 October , 2005 , when the Chairman of the 1922 Committee , Sir Michael Spicer , received a letter of resignation from Michael Howard. Nominations for candidates opened immediately, and closed on 13 October .

The first round of voting amongst Conservative Members Of Parliament took place on 18 October and Kenneth Clarke was eliminated (38 votes) leaving David Davis (62 votes), David Cameron (56 votes) and Liam Fox (42 votes) to go through to the second ballot on October 20 . In the second ballot, Liam Fox was eliminated (51 votes), leaving David Cameron (90 votes) and David Davis (57 votes) to go through to a postal ballot. The ballot, whose result was declared on December 6 , saw David Cameron win a large majority on a 77% turnout. {Link without Title} .

The end result was;


Total number of valid ballots - 198,844


RESULTS


The first ballot of MPs was held on 18 October . The results were announced, ten minutes later than expected, at 5:30 pm by Sir Michael Spicer, the Chairman of the 1922 Committee.


There were no abstentions, with all 198 Conservative members voting. Cameron, Davis and Fox went through to the second ballot held on October 20 . The results were announced by the Chairman of the 1922 Committee at 5:30pm.

There were no abstentions, with all 198 Conservative members voting. Cameron and Davis went through to the runoff vote of the Conservative Party's 300,000 members. The votes were counted on .


OTHER POSSIBLE CANDIDATES


The following Conservatives previously announced they were standing but subsequently withdrew from the contest:

  • Alan Duncan - announced early but withdrew after failing to find substantial support.

  • Sir Malcolm Rifkind - withdrew after the conference speeches, citing limited support.


The following prominent Conservatives formally ruled themselves out of the running:


Edward Leigh and John Redwood were both cited by prominent media organisations as potential candidates, but the deadline for nominations passed without a submission from either individual.


THE RULES OF THE CONTEST


Much speculation surrounded the review of the rules, as it is widely estimated that the system eventually adopted could prove a help or hindrance to particular candidates with strong support in certain areas of the party. However, on September 27th , 2005, the proposal to change the rules was rejected. {Link without Title}


The current rules


Under the rules adopted in 1998 , under which both Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard were elected, a leadership contest can be initiated either by the incumbent leader resigning or by the Parliamentary Party passing a Vote Of No Confidence in the present leader. The latter is called if 15% of the Parliamentary Party write to the Chairman of the 1922 Committee . If a vote of no confidence is passed, a leadership election is called and the incumbent is barred from standing in it.

The returning officer is the Chairman of the 1922 Committee . Candidates must be nominated by any two MPs taking the Conservative whip. If only one candidate stands (as happened in the 2003 Leadership Election ) then they are elected ''nem con'' (uncontested).

If two candidates stand, then the election immediately proceeds to a ballot of all members of the party. If more than two candidates stand, then MPs first hold a series of ballots to reduce the number to two. On each round, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. (If two or more candidates tie for last place, as happened in the 2001 Contest , then the ballot is repeated, and if the tie remains, all bottom-placed candidates are eliminated.) Candidates may also withdraw between rounds (this also happened in the 2001 contest).

The series of ballots by MPs continues until there are only two candidates remaining. At this point the all-member ballot begins; this lasts for some weeks. To be eligible to vote, an individual has to have been a paid-up member of the party for at least three months. The candidate who tops the poll is declared leader.


Criticisms of the current rules


Many criticisms have been made of the rules, in light of some problems encountered in previous elections. Amongst the concerns raised are:


=Technical


  • The provision for resolving a tie was originally lacking and hastily devised during the 2001 election.

  • The tie-breaking mechanism is arguably clumsy.

  • In the contests in both 1997 (although taking place under previous rules) and 2001, the position of Chairman of the 1922 Committee was vacant for some weeks owing to the previous holder either retiring or being defeated in the recent general election. Many felt that this prolonged the contests unnecessarily and have called for the Returning Officer to be a party office bearer that is unlikely to be vacant in the aftermath of a general election.

  • Errors in the party's membership lists can lead to individual members being disenfranchised.



=Structural


Many have criticised the system as having being devised to try to answer those who believed that a leader should have the backing of the bulk of MPs, to answer demands for ordinary party members to have a say, and to allow for the removal of a failing leader. It is possible for a candidate to reach the final two with the support of barely a third of MPs in the final ballot (or even less if the rival candidate has overwhelming support in the Parliamentary Party) and then be elected leader by the party members. Conversely, they are then vulnerable to being removed as leader by the MPs.

Some have argued that party members are unrepresentative of the electorate at large and are prone to elect a leader reflecting their views rather than those of the country at large.


Proposed new rules


In late May 2005 a proposed new system was formally circulated by the party {Link without Title} . The rules were as follows:

  • If one candidate was proposed by more than half the MPs they would be automatically declared elected.

  • A candidate must have the support of at least 10% of the Parliamentary Party (20 MPs) to stand.

  • The candidates would go forward to the National Convention, made up of senior figures in the voluntary wing of the party. Here the candidates would be ranked in order of popularity.

  • MPs would vote on the list through a series of eliminative ballots and select the leader.

  • The candidate who receives the most votes in the National Convention would be immune from elimination and would be guaranteed a place in the final round.

  • A campaign spending limit of £25,000 would be imposed. These funds would be supplied by the party, but any money raised by individual candidates will be deducted from this fund.


The proposed new rules would have given MPs the final say on the leader and replaced the all member ballot with a vote at the National Convention of senior party figures. Both this and the caps on spending limits were widely believed to be most likely to harm the chances of David Davis.

The proposed changes led to disputes and were rejected on 27th September 2005. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4285182.stm


TIMELINE OF EVENTS


  • May 6 2005 - In the aftermath of the 2005 General Election Michael Howard announces that there will be a review of the rules for electing a leader and that once this review is complete he will stand down. Shadow Chancellor Oliver Letwin immediately confirms he will not be standing.




  • May 21 2005 - A survey of local party chairmen in Conservative held seats finds that the majority of respondents are happy for MPs to select the leader. {Link without Title}



  • May 22 2005 - David Davis is reported to be undecided about whether to stand, stating that he always made his mind up about "these things at the last possible minute". {Link without Title}


  • May 23 2005 - Andrew Lansley calls for the party to radically reform itself, calling for the description "Reform Conservatives" to be used. He states he is undecided about whether or not to stand for the leadership. {Link without Title}


  • May 24 2005 - Former leader Iain Duncan Smith cautions against proposals to remove grassroots members' say in the selection of the leader. {Link without Title}


  • May 25 2005 - A consultation document on party reforms is formally circulated, including proposals to change the way the leader is elected, giving the final say to MPs and withdrawing the all-party member ballot. {Link without Title}



  • May 29 2005 - A Referendum In France rejects the EU Constitution . Many commentators believe that this makes it likely that the constitution will no longer be an issue in UK politics that this removes a major obstacle to a Clarke leadership.


  • June 1 2005 - A Referendum In The Netherlands also rejects the Constitution, reinforcing mounting speculation that the Constitution will be abandoned and that this in turn makes Kenneth Clarke a more viable contender.


  • June 2 2005 - Former leader Iain Duncan Smith calls for the next leader to be from "the mainstream of Eurosceptic opinion" in what is seen as a dismissal of Kenneth Clarke. {Link without Title}








  • June 13 2005 - Tim Yeo states in an interview that he feels there are "too many" candidates for the leadership and calls for the "plethora of would-be leaders" from the party's liberal wing to unite around a single candidate. {Link without Title}



  • June 15 2005 - At a meeting of the 1922 Backbench Committee Conservative MPs holds an indicative vote on several proposed options for electing the leader. A system where MPs select the leader with a formal consultation of members is the preferred option. {Link without Title}






  • June 19 2005 - Kenneth Clarke declares that he is "keen" to run for the leadership, though notes that there will be some months in which to make a final decision. {Link without Title}


  • June 29 2005 - David Cameron makes a speech entitled "We're all in it together" in which he sets out his views on the future of the party and calls for families and married couples to receive greater support from the government. {Link without Title}



  • July 1 2005 - Kenneth Clarke declares that he has sufficient support in the parliamentary party to be nominated for the leadership and that he will be a candidate "unless it becomes clear by the autumn that I don't have a serious prospect". {Link without Title}


  • July 3 2005 - Oliver Letwin declares his support for David Cameron, increasing the latter's chances of being the main challenger from the left of the party. {Link without Title}


  • July 5 2005 - Michael Ancram warns that removing ordinary members' say in electing a leader will not make the party more attractive to voters. {Link without Title}


  • July 6 2005 - Conservative MPs at a meeting of the 1922 Backbench Committee agree a system whereby a candidate with the support of 5% of MPs (currently 10 MPs) could stand and with a consultative poll of constituency party chairmen, who would each put forward two names, but with MPs making the final decisions. {Link without Title}




  • June 19 2005 - A survey of primarily Conservative Party members and supporters reveals that there is strong support for MPs making the final decision but also strong support for ordinary party members having a formal say in the process. The same survey finds David Davis to be the most popular choice amongst respondents. {Link without Title}


  • July 21 2005 - MPs finish voting on proposals to change the rules and back a system that gives them the final say. Objections to removing the role of grassroots members are made by the Campaign For Conservative Democracy and by prominent Conservative MPs including Theresa May, Andrew Lansley, Iain Duncan Smith, Michael Ancram and David Willets. {Link without Title}








  • October 5 2005 - Deputy Leader Michael Ancram rules himself out of the contest, citing a lack of support. He also announces he will return to the backbenches when the new leader is elected. {Link without Title}




  • October 12 2005 - It is reported that the Cornerstone Group of right-wing Conservative MPs will not field a candidate of their own, otherwise expected to be Edward Leigh, but will instead support Liam Fox. {Link without Title}


  • October 18 2005 - Kenneth Clarke is eliminated in the first ballot of MPs.


  • October 20 2005 - Liam Fox is eliminated in the second ballot of MPs.





Election Timetable




PARTY CONFERENCE


At the 2005 Conservative Party conference, each of the five announced candidates at the time was allowed a 20 minute speech. This was seen by many as the start of the leadership campaign by each of the candidates and their speeches were closely analysed by party members and the media. Many felt that front-runner (at the time of his speech) David Davis had performed rather poorly, while the speeches of Kenneth Clarke, Liam Fox, Sir Malcom Rifkind and David Cameron were much better. This led to a rapid change in The Odds of the five candidates on the Betting Markets - on the morning of the 6th October, David Davis was the clear leader and David Cameron third, but by the evening of the same day the two had swapped places. By the end of the conference, David Cameron had become the front runner, with Ken Clarke and David Davis closely behind.

The conference was also seen as similar to the Conservative's 1963 conference, where there was also a race to become leader.


POLLING


The Sunday Times and YouGov polled 746 members of the Conservative Party just after the conference. The results can be found here . The poll showed support slipping away from David Davis and Ken Clarke and moving to Liam Fox and David Cameron instead.

The Daily Telegraph and YouGov polled 665 members of the Conservative Party just after the first ballot, where Clarke was eliminated leaving only three contestants. The poll showed that 59 percent backed David Cameron, against 18 percent for Liam Fox and 15 per cent for Mr Davis. This poll showed support for Mr Cameron being strong amongst the grassroots of the party on the eve of the final (membership) ballot.

In a YouGov poll published on November 12th, more than two-thirds of party members look set to vote for the younger candidate as party leader. Around 68 per cent of voters who have already returned their ballot papers have opted for Mr Cameron, while 66 per cent of those still to vote say they are likely to choose him over Shadow Home Secretary David Davis. 57 per cent of those still to vote said they may change their mind between now and the postal ballot deadline on December 5.


Hague discloses support

Former Conservative leader William Hague was revealed to be backing David Cameron to become the next party leader when he declared his support in an article written for the News Of The World on Sunday 13th November.


RESULT


The final decision made by the 253,600 Tory members and announced on 6 December was a victory for David Cameron.
198,844 voted, 134,446 for Cameron, 64,398 for Davis.
Mr Cameron said his party now had to change how they looked, felt and behaved. He set out core challenges for his leadership: creating a full-bodied economic policy which went beyond just tax; giving freedom to those on the frontline in public services; national and international security; and ensuring social justice by strengthening the voluntary sector.


EXTERNAL LINKS