| Concerned Alumni Of Princeton |
Article Index for Concerned |
Website Links For Alumni |
Information AboutConcerned Alumni Of Princeton |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT CONCERNED ALUMNI OF PRINCETON | |
| princeton university | |
|
The existence of the organization attracted wide notice in , a Democrat , was a member until 1973, when he resigned because of the tone of the organization's magazine, ''Prospect''. Republican Senator Bill Frist , at the time a recent Princeton alumnus, contributed to a report that labeled the organization as far-right and extremist. OPPOSITION TO COEDUCATION In 1974, the New York Times reported on CAPs support for quotas guaranteeing that male students would receive most of the available admissions slots, and its earlier and continuing opposition to Princeton allowing women to attend at all. In the following excerpt, "Mr. Bushnell" refers to CAP co-chairman Asa S. Bushnell , and "Mr. Jones" refers to T. Harding Jones , CAP's executive director. Whether or not the administration satisfies CAP on the faculty issue, the recent decision by the university's Board of Trustees to eliminate sex-based admissions quotas jolted these conservative alumni, many of whom wanted Princeton to remain an all-male institution in the first place.
– New York Times, March 3, 1974. http://www.isthatlegal.org/images/cap1.pdf ALITO HEARINGS In the confirmation hearings, CAP attracted attention because of its public stance against affirmative action and co-education at Princeton. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee who were questioning Alito suggested that his involvement in this group could shed some light on his stance on minority and women's rights issues, which may come before him if he is confirmed as an Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court . The result of an extensive search of CAP documentation demanded by Ted Kennedy on January 11th, 2006 was that no mention of or connection to Sam Alito was found. INTERPRETATION OF VIEWS CAP's rhetoric had several sometimes contradictory interpretations. For example, one of its central precepts was opposition to Coeducation (i.e. opposition to Princeton admitting women) and many allege that the group in its early years regarded itself as a defender of an all male, explicitly Christian Princeton. CAP's founder, Shelby Cullom Davis, stated that one of CAP's goals was to significantly reduce the number of women at Princeton. However, there are some who argue that CAP simply opposed admission quotas to fulfil the university's Affirmative Action goals. QUOTA SYSTEM FOR MALES CAP supported quotas preserving admission spots for males. {Link without Title} REACTION BY UNDERGRADUATES, FACULTY AND STAFF CAP appears to have been treated as a nuisance or danger by some of the Princeton community contemporaneous to its most active period. Faculty members were wary of participating in a CAP-sponsored political survey. CAP was repeatedly mocked by the school's Band and the university's chaplain in 1973 defended himself against charges of radicalism [http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/apr1973/v30-1-criticscorner1.htm . EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|